Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All weed control measures increased pod number and yield of okra compared with unweeded plots.

A claim from Integrated Weed Management in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control measures increased pod number and yield of okra compared with unweeded plots.

Treatment
weed control measurese3
Outcome
Number of pods and yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
un- weeded plotse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Integrated Weed Management in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34
e3

“Number of pods and yield was increased by all the weed control measures as compared to un- weeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–614

Title

Integrated Weed Management in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)

Moolchand Singh; S. Prabhukumar; C. V. Sairam Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c78c8b9abc4bb19a5132189829d0a03eb34160030284bf0152c3ee9b8f7ac75c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.