Paper · 2000 · Nematropica

Population dynamics of Meloidogyne incognita and infestation levels by Pasteuria penetrans in a naturally infested field in Martinique.

Aurelio Ciancio; Patrik Queneherve

13
claims
36
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The population dynamics of Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2) in association with the parasite Pasteuria penetrans was studied in a field in Martinique. Data obtained at three-week intervals for one year were analyzed to study the relationship between J2 density and endospore infestation levels. Six crop sequences were evaluated in five replicates. They were: resistant tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage; susceptible tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage; bean, pepper, fallow, cabbage; eggplant, fallow; cucumber, velvetbean, fallow, cabbage; fallow, pepper, cabbage, fallow, cabbage. The J2 densities showed fluctuating trends, frequently synchronous with fluctuations of endospore infestation. The highest J2 numbers observed ranged between 1 000 and 1 500 nematodes/100 g of soil in the first four crop sequences, and between 150 and 250 J2/100 g of soil in the last two. The highest percentages of nematodes with adhering endospores ranged between 50 and 70%. The resistant tomato crop showed a sharp decrease in the nematode density at the end of the crop sequence, with a similar synchronous decrease of the endospore infestation. This trend was also observed during the fallow periods in the other treatments. Susceptible crops allowed a sharp increase of the J2 densities. During these periods of population growth, the concomitant increase of the endospore infestation levels was interrupted with fast growing J2 densities. In the last two crop sequences, the J2 densities progressively decreased because of the on-host status of velvetbean and of a longer fallow, respectively. When all the pooled data from the six treatments were considered, a significant linear correlation was observed between J2 densities and the corresponding endospore infestation values (P 0.001). This relationship appeared related to the density of females releasing J2 and/or endospores in the soil. All pooled mean densities also followed the Gutenberg-Richter power law distribution, indicating the oc-currence of chaotic effects influencing their dynamics. Although chaos implies non-predictability of J2 numbers and endospore infestation dynamics, it also suggests that large-scale fluctuations may induce local nematode suppression by P. penetrans.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J2 density fluctuated synchronously with endospore infestation.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Second interactor
Pasteuria penetransPasteuria penetranse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
J2 densitiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The J2 densities showed fluctuating trends, frequently synchronous with fluctuations of endospore infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“They were: resistant tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2) in association with the parasite Pasteuria penetrans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first four crop sequences reached 1 000 to 1 500 nematodes per 100 g soil.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Outcome
J2 numberse0
Value
1 000 and 1 500 nematodes/100 g of soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest J2 numbers observed ranged between 1 000 and 1 500 nematodes/100 g of soil in the first four crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“They were: resistant tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The last two crop sequences reached 150 to 250 J2 per 100 g soil.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Outcome
J2e0
Value
150 and 250 J2/100 g of soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between 150 and 250 J2/100 g of soil in the last two.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“They were: resistant tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The peak proportion of nematodes bearing endospores ranged from 50 to 70%.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Second interactor
Pasteuria penetransPasteuria penetranse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematodes with adhering endosporese0
Value
50 and 70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentages of nematodes with adhering endospores ranged between 50 and 70%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“They were: resistant tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2) in association with the parasite Pasteuria penetrans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant tomato reduced nematode density sharply at the end of the sequence.

Material
resistant tomatoe0
Treatment
resistant tomato crope0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
nematode densitye0
Direction
sharp decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The resistant tomato crop showed a sharp decrease in the nematode density at the end of the crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1062 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endospore infestation also declined synchronously after resistant tomato.

Treatment
resistant tomato crope0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Second interactor
Pasteuria penetransPasteuria penetranse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
endospore infestatione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The resistant tomato crop showed a sharp decrease in the nematode density at the end of the crop sequence, with a similar synchronous decrease of the endospore infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2) in association with the parasite Pasteuria penetrans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow periods showed the same declining nematode and infestation trends.

Treatment
fallow periodse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Outcome
nematode densitye1
Direction
decreasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This trend was also observed during the fallow periods in the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1209 · show in text ↑
e1

“The resistant tomato crop showed a sharp decrease in the nematode density at the end of the crop sequence, with a similar synchronous decrease of the endospore infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1129 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible crops permitted a sharp rise in J2 density.

Material
Susceptible cropse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Outcome
J2 densitiese0
Direction
sharp increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Susceptible crops allowed a sharp increase of the J2 densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1273 · show in text ↑
e1

“susceptible tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–423 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During rapid J2 population growth, accompanying increases in endospore infestation were interrupted.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Second interactor
Pasteuria penetransPasteuria penetranse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
endospore infestation levelse0
Direction
interruptede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During these periods of population growth, the concomitant increase of the endospore infestation levels was interrupted with fast growing J2 densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1425 · show in text ↑
e1

“susceptible tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–423 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2) in association with the parasite Pasteuria penetrans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–116 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J2 density progressively declined in the velvetbean sequence because of its reported host status.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
J2 densitiese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
on-host status of velvetbeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mucuna pruriens var. utilis
Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · Taxon · picture of the speciesDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the last two crop sequences, the J2 densities progressively decreased because of the on-host status of velvetbean and of a longer fallow, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1580 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J2 density progressively declined in the longer-fallow sequence.

Treatment
longer fallowe0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Outcome
J2 densitiese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the last two crop sequences, the J2 densities progressively decreased because of the on-host status of velvetbean and of a longer fallow, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1580 · show in text ↑
e1

“They were: resistant tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled J2 density and endospore infestation had a significant linear correlation.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Second interactor
Pasteuria penetransPasteuria penetranse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
J2 densities and the corresponding endospore infestation valuese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant linear correlation was observed between J2 densities and the corresponding endospore infestation values (P 0.001).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1775 · show in text ↑
e1

“They were: resistant tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2) in association with the parasite Pasteuria penetrans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled mean densities followed a Gutenberg-Richter power-law distribution.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Outcome
pooled mean densitiese0
Qualifier
Gutenberg-Richter power law distributione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All pooled mean densities also followed the Gutenberg-Richter power law distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–1965 · show in text ↑
e1

“They were: resistant tomato, okra, fallow, cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 · show in text ↑