Paper · 2012 · Grass and Forage Science

Genotypic variation and selection of traits related to forage yield in tall fescue under irrigated and drought stress environments

M. Ebrahimiyan; M. M. Majidi; A. Mirlohi

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
46
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Development of a standard evaluation protocol has been a pressing problem for the selection of drought‐resistant genotypes of tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea ). This study was conducted to evaluate the association of forage yield with specific phenological and morphological traits to find a proper model for indirect selection under irrigated (normal) and drought‐stress conditions in tall fescue. A random sample of seventy‐five genotypes were clonally propagated and evaluated in normal and drought‐stress environments in the field during 2009 and 2010. Results showed that water stress had a negative effect on forage yield and most of the morphological traits measured and reduced genotypic variation for most of them. Forage yield had the highest genotypic variation, whereas days to pollination had the lowest variation. Low broad‐sense heritability estimates were obtained for dry‐matter yield, but heritability for the traits of number of stems per plant, plant height and crown diameter was moderately high. These traits were identified as the main components of forage yield. The importance of these components and their direct and indirect effects on forage yield was different in normal and drought‐stress conditions. This suggests that indirect selection for developing high‐yielding, drought‐tolerant varieties should be performed under drought‐stress conditions with a specific model.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced forage yield and most measured morphological traits.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
forage yield and most of the morphological traitse0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress had a negative effect on forage yield and most of the morphological traits measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced genotypic variation for most measured traits.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
genotypic variatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress had a negative effect on forage yield and most of the morphological traits measured and reduced genotypic variation for most of them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage yield had the highest genotypic variation, while days to pollination had the lowest.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
genotypic variatione0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
days to pollination had the lowest variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage yield had the highest genotypic variation, whereas days to pollination had the lowest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield had low broad sense heritability.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Organ / stage
dry‐matter yielde0
Outcome
broad‐sense heritabilitye0
Direction
Lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low broad‐sense heritability estimates were obtained for dry‐matter yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem number, height and crown diameter had moderately high heritability.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
heritabilitye0
Direction
moderately highe0
Qualifier
number of stems per plant, plant height and crown diametere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heritability for the traits of number of stems per plant, plant height and crown diameter was moderately high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem number, height and crown diameter were main components of forage yield.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
main components of forage yielde0
Qualifier
These traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These traits were identified as the main components of forage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The direct and indirect effects of yield components differed between normal and drought conditions.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
drought‐stress conditionse0
Outcome
effects on forage yielde0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The importance of these components and their direct and indirect effects on forage yield was different in normal and drought‐stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend indirect selection for high yielding drought tolerant varieties under drought stress.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
indirect selectione0
Qualifier
under drought‐stress conditions with a specific modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indirect selection for developing high‐yielding, drought‐tolerant varieties should be performed under drought‐stress conditions with a specific model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.