Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Response of saline water irrigated greengram (Vigna radiata) to land configuration, fertilizers and farm yard manure in Tapi command area of south Gujarat

RAM A. JAT; M.K. ARVADIA; BHUMIKA TANDEL; et al.

13
claims
40
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2008-09 and 2009-10 post-rainy seasons at Navsari, Gujarat to evaluate the effects of land configuration, fertilizers and farm yard manure (FYM) application on productivity, water use efficiency, nutrient uptake, soil fertility status and the economics of green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation. The raised bed method of planting was found superior as was evident from significant increase in growth and yield attributes, grain (0.93 t/ha) and stover yield (2.27 t/ha), irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), nitrogen (N), phos- phorus (P) and potassium (K) uptake, net returns ( 37.6 103/ha) and B:C ratio (3.9) and decrease in plant mor- tality percent. Application of 100% recommended dose of nitrogen (20 kg/ha) and phosphorus (40 kg P O /ha) re- 2 5 corded significantly higher growth and yield attributes, grain and stover yield, IWUE, NPK uptake, available NPK in the soil, net returns and B:C ratio over the application of 75% of recommended dose of N and P. Similarly, the application of FYM at 5t/ha recorded statistically higher growth and yield attributes, grain and stover yield, IWUE, NPK uptake, available NPK in the soil after harvest, net returns and B:C ratio and decrease in plant mortality per- cent over no FYM application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds increased green gram growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
raised bed method of plantinge0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The raised bed method of planting was found superior as was evident from significant increase in growth and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–464 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds produced grain yield of 0.93 t/ha.

Treatment
raised bed method of plantinge2
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasee2
Value
0.93 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain (0.93 t/ha) and stover yield (2.27 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–512 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“The raised bed method of planting was found superior as was evident from significant increase in growth and yield attributes, grain (0.93 t/ha) and stover yield (2.27 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds produced stover yield of 2.27 t/ha.

Treatment
raised bed method of plantinge2
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
increasee2
Value
2.27 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield (2.27 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–512 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“The raised bed method of planting was found superior as was evident from significant increase in growth and yield attributes, grain (0.93 t/ha) and stover yield (2.27 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds increased irrigation water use efficiency and N, P, and K uptake.

Treatment
raised bed method of plantinge2
Outcome
irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), nitrogen (N), phos- phorus (P) and potassium (K) uptakee0
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), nitrogen (N), phos- phorus (P) and potassium (K) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“The raised bed method of planting was found superior as was evident from significant increase in growth and yield attributes, grain (0.93 t/ha) and stover yield (2.27 t/ha), irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), nitrogen (N), phos- phorus (P) and potassium (K) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds increased net returns and benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
raised bed method of plantinge2
Outcome
net returns ( 37.6 103/ha) and B:C ratio (3.9)e0
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns ( 37.6 103/ha) and B:C ratio (3.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“The raised bed method of planting was found superior as was evident from significant increase in growth and yield attributes, grain (0.93 t/ha) and stover yield (2.27 t/ha), irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), nitrogen (N), phos- phorus (P) and potassium (K) uptake, net returns ( 37.6 103/ha) and B:C ratio (3.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds decreased plant mortality.

Treatment
raised bed method of plantinge2
Outcome
plant mor- tality percente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in plant mor- tality percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–699 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“The raised bed method of planting was found superior as was evident from significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended N and P increased growth, yield attributes, grain and stover yield, and water use efficiency compared with 75%.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of nitrogen (20 kg/ha) and phosphorus (40 kg P O /ha)e0
Outcome
growth and yield attributes, grain and stover yield, IWUEe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
75% of recommended dose of N and Pe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% recommended dose of nitrogen (20 kg/ha) and phosphorus (40 kg P O /ha) re- 2 5 corded significantly higher growth and yield attributes, grain and stover yield, IWUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“over the application of 75% of recommended dose of N and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended N and P increased NPK uptake and available soil NPK versus 75%.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of nitrogen (20 kg/ha) and phosphorus (40 kg P O /ha)e2
Outcome
NPK uptake, available NPK in the soile0
Direction
highere2
Comparator
75% of recommended dose of N and Pe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IWUE, NPK uptake, available NPK in the soil, net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 100% recommended dose of nitrogen (20 kg/ha) and phosphorus (40 kg P O /ha) re- 2 5 corded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–827 · show in text ↑
e3

“75% of recommended dose of N and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended N and P increased net returns and B:C ratio versus 75%.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of nitrogen (20 kg/ha) and phosphorus (40 kg P O /ha)e2
Outcome
net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere2
Comparator
75% of recommended dose of N and Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns and B:C ratio over the application of 75% of recommended dose of N and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 100% recommended dose of nitrogen (20 kg/ha) and phosphorus (40 kg P O /ha) re- 2 5 corded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 5t/ha increased growth and yield attributes, grain and stover yield, and IWUE versus no FYM.

Treatment
FYM at 5t/hae0
Outcome
growth and yield attributes, grain and stover yield, IWUEe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no FYM applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of FYM at 5t/ha recorded statistically higher growth and yield attributes, grain and stover yield, IWUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“over no FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 5t/ha increased NPK uptake and available soil NPK versus no FYM.

Treatment
FYM at 5t/hae2
Outcome
NPK uptake, available NPK in the soil after harveste0
Direction
highere2
Comparator
no FYM applicatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK uptake, available NPK in the soil after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of FYM at 5t/ha recorded statistically higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1084 · show in text ↑
e3

“no FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 5t/ha increased net returns and B:C ratio versus no FYM.

Treatment
FYM at 5t/hae2
Outcome
net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere2
Comparator
no FYM applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns and B:C ratio and decrease in plant mortality per- cent over no FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of FYM at 5t/ha recorded statistically higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 5t/ha decreased plant mortality versus no FYM.

Treatment
FYM at 5t/hae2
Outcome
plant mortality per- cente0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
no FYM applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in plant mortality per- cent over no FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram ( Vigna radiata L.) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of FYM at 5t/ha recorded statistically higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1084 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    FYM enhanced following mungbean N and P uptake.

    Integrated nutrient management in wheat (Triticum aestivum) mungbeail (Phaseolus radiatus) cropping sequence in arid region · 2001 · compared with the control and 90 kg Nlha

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.