Paper · 2012 · Progressive Horticulture

Effect of integrated nutrient management on insect vectors population, incidence of stem necrosis disease and production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L) – onion (Allium cepa) cropping system

Sandeep Singh; Anuj Bhatnagar; A. K. Somani; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2005–06 and 2006–07 at Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh to study the effect of different dates of haulm cuttings and combination of organic and inorganic source of nutrients on potato (Solanum tuberosum)-onion (Allium cepa) sequence. Influence of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on insect vectors & stem necrosis disease, if any was also studied. Delaying date of haulm cutting from 60 to 74 days after planting (DAP) increased potato tuber yield. Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM) maximized potato equivalent yield (294), production efficiency (400), gross return (Rs 1,81,491) and net return (Rs 85,863). Benefit: cost ratio were same in all the combinations except control. The succession and incidence of thrips, whitefly and leafhopper did not vary significantly among the treatments. Stem necrosis disease incidence and index were lowest in the treatment without FYM and no NPK fertilizer application (37.5% and 8.6%, respectively). It was highest in the treatment without FYM and 100% NPK fertilizer (63.2% incidence and 16.1% index, respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying haulm cutting from 60 to 74 days after planting increased potato tuber yield.

Treatment
Delaying date of haulm cutting from 60 to 74 days after planting (DAP)e1
Outcome
potato tuber yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delaying date of haulm cutting from 60 to 74 days after planting (DAP) increased potato tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 75% NPK inorganic and 25% N organic (FYM) nutrition maximized potato equivalent yield.

Treatment
Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM)e2
Outcome
potato equivalent yielde2
Direction
maximizede2
Value
294e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM) maximized potato equivalent yield (294), production efficiency (400), gross return (Rs 1,81,491) and net return (Rs 85,863)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same 75% NPK plus 25% N (FYM) nutrition maximized production efficiency of potato.

Treatment
Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM)e2
Outcome
production efficiencye2
Direction
maximizede2
Value
400e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM) maximized potato equivalent yield (294), production efficiency (400), gross return (Rs 1,81,491) and net return (Rs 85,863)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same 75% NPK plus 25% N (FYM) nutrition maximized gross return from potato.

Treatment
Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM)e2
Outcome
gross returne2
Direction
maximizede2
Value
Rs 1,81,491e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM) maximized potato equivalent yield (294), production efficiency (400), gross return (Rs 1,81,491) and net return (Rs 85,863)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same 75% NPK plus 25% N (FYM) nutrition maximized net return from potato.

Treatment
Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM)e2
Outcome
net returne2
Direction
maximizede2
Value
Rs 85,863e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 75%NPK through inorganic source and 25% N through organic source (FYM) maximized potato equivalent yield (294), production efficiency (400), gross return (Rs 1,81,491) and net return (Rs 85,863)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit to cost ratio was the same across nutrient combinations except control.

Treatment
all the combinationse3
Outcome
Benefit: cost ratioe3
Direction
samee3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e3

“Benefit: cost ratio were same in all the combinations except control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incidence of thrips, whitefly and leafhopper did not vary significantly among nutrient treatments.

Treatment
the treatmentse4
Interactor
thripsThripse4pest
Second interactor
whiteflye4pest
Outcome
incidence of thrips, whitefly and leafhoppere4
Direction
did not varye4
Qualifier
leafhoppere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e4

“The succession and incidence of thrips, whitefly and leafhopper did not vary significantly among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem necrosis disease incidence was lowest where no FYM and no NPK were applied, at 37.5%.

Treatment
without FYM and no NPK fertilizer applicatione5
Outcome
Stem necrosis disease incidencee5
Direction
loweste5
Value
37.5%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“Stem necrosis disease incidence and index were lowest in the treatment without FYM and no NPK fertilizer application (37.5% and 8.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem necrosis disease index was lowest where no FYM and no NPK were applied, at 8.6%.

Treatment
without FYM and no NPK fertilizer applicatione5
Outcome
indexe5
Direction
loweste5
Value
8.6%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e5

“Stem necrosis disease incidence and index were lowest in the treatment without FYM and no NPK fertilizer application (37.5% and 8.6%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem necrosis disease incidence was highest where FYM was absent and 100% NPK was applied, at 63.2%.

Treatment
without FYM and 100% NPK fertilizere6
Outcome
incidencee6
Direction
higheste6
Value
63.2%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e6

“It was highest in the treatment without FYM and 100% NPK fertilizer (63.2% incidence and 16.1% index, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem necrosis disease index was highest where FYM was absent and 100% NPK was applied, at 16.1%.

Treatment
without FYM and 100% NPK fertilizere6
Outcome
indexe6
Direction
higheste6
Value
16.1%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“production potential of potato (Solanum tuberosum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–162 · show in text ↑
e6

“It was highest in the treatment without FYM and 100% NPK fertilizer (63.2% incidence and 16.1% index, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1148 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 33 positive, 15 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.