Paper · 2014 · Pesticide Research Journal

Field Efficacy of Newer Insecticides against Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Bihar

Tamoghna Saha; Nithya Chandran; Randhir Kumar; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on the field experiments carried out for three seasons during kharif 2010 – 11 to kharif 2012–13, rynaxypyr (Coragen 20 SC) 0.006%, flubendiamide (Fame 480 SC) 0.01%, spinosad (Spintor 45 SC) 0.0135% and emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 WG) 0.0025% provided superior control of shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee on brinjal. Effectiveness of these treatments was reflected in terms of reduction in infestation and significantly higher fruit yield in comparison to the other treatments. Population of coccinellids, syrphids and spiders at the end of three rounds of foliar application depicted safety of the newer molecules to the predators. Cost benefit ratio was the highest for cypermethrin 20EC, deltamethrin 5EC + triazophos 35EC, rynaxypyr 20 SC and spinosad 45 SC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rynaxypyr (Coragen 20 SC) 0.006% gave superior control of brinjal shoot and fruit borer.

Treatment
rynaxypyr (Coragen 20 SC) 0.006%e0
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalis GueneeLeucinodes orbonalise0pest
Outcome
control of shoot and fruit borere0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the field experiments carried out for three seasons during kharif 2010 – 11 to kharif 2012–13, rynaxypyr (Coragen 20 SC) 0.006%, flubendiamide (Fame 480 SC) 0.01%, spinosad (Spintor 45 SC) 0.0135% and emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 WG) 0.0025% provided superior control of shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee on brinjal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

flubendiamide (Fame 480 SC) 0.01% gave superior control of brinjal shoot and fruit borer.

Treatment
flubendiamide (Fame 480 SC) 0.01%e0
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalis GueneeLeucinodes orbonalise0pest
Outcome
control of shoot and fruit borere0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the field experiments carried out for three seasons during kharif 2010 – 11 to kharif 2012–13, rynaxypyr (Coragen 20 SC) 0.006%, flubendiamide (Fame 480 SC) 0.01%, spinosad (Spintor 45 SC) 0.0135% and emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 WG) 0.0025% provided superior control of shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee on brinjal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad (Spintor 45 SC) 0.0135% gave superior control of brinjal shoot and fruit borer.

Treatment
spinosad (Spintor 45 SC) 0.0135%e0
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalis GueneeLeucinodes orbonalise0pest
Outcome
control of shoot and fruit borere0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the field experiments carried out for three seasons during kharif 2010 – 11 to kharif 2012–13, rynaxypyr (Coragen 20 SC) 0.006%, flubendiamide (Fame 480 SC) 0.01%, spinosad (Spintor 45 SC) 0.0135% and emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 WG) 0.0025% provided superior control of shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee on brinjal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 WG) 0.0025% gave superior control of brinjal shoot and fruit borer.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 WG) 0.0025%e0
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalis GueneeLeucinodes orbonalise0pest
Outcome
control of shoot and fruit borere0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the field experiments carried out for three seasons during kharif 2010 – 11 to kharif 2012–13, rynaxypyr (Coragen 20 SC) 0.006%, flubendiamide (Fame 480 SC) 0.01%, spinosad (Spintor 45 SC) 0.0135% and emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 WG) 0.0025% provided superior control of shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee on brinjal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide treatments reduced infestation relative to other treatments.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Effectiveness of these treatments was reflected in terms of reduction in infestation and significantly higher fruit yield in comparison to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide treatments raised fruit yield relative to other treatments.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Effectiveness of these treatments was reflected in terms of reduction in infestation and significantly higher fruit yield in comparison to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator populations indicated safety of the newer insecticides.

Taxon
coccinellidse0
Outcome
safety of the newer molecules to the predatorse0

Verbatim

e0

“Population of coccinellids, syrphids and spiders at the end of three rounds of foliar application depicted safety of the newer molecules to the predators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–660 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cypermethrin 20EC had a highest cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
cypermethrin 20ECe0
Outcome
Cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cost benefit ratio was the highest for cypermethrin 20EC, deltamethrin 5EC + triazophos 35EC, rynaxypyr 20 SC and spinosad 45 SC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

deltamethrin 5EC + triazophos 35EC had a highest cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
deltamethrin 5EC + triazophos 35ECe0
Outcome
Cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cost benefit ratio was the highest for cypermethrin 20EC, deltamethrin 5EC + triazophos 35EC, rynaxypyr 20 SC and spinosad 45 SC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rynaxypyr 20 SC had a highest cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
rynaxypyr 20 SCe0
Outcome
Cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cost benefit ratio was the highest for cypermethrin 20EC, deltamethrin 5EC + triazophos 35EC, rynaxypyr 20 SC and spinosad 45 SC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad 45 SC had a highest cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
spinosad 45 SCe0
Outcome
Cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cost benefit ratio was the highest for cypermethrin 20EC, deltamethrin 5EC + triazophos 35EC, rynaxypyr 20 SC and spinosad 45 SC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–790 · show in text ↑

flubendiamide · Leucinodes orbonalis · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

spinosad · Leucinodes orbonalis · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

45 papers: 45 positive, 0 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Leucinodes orbonalis · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

45 papers: 45 positive, 0 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.