Paper · 2005 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Bio-efficacy of Beta-cyfluthrin and Lambda-cyhalothrin Against Helicoverpa armigera Hüb. in Chick pea

S.P. Singh; N. K. Singh

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of beta-cyfluthrin and lambda-cyhalothrin against Helicoverpa armigera in chick pea. Both the insecticides were found superior to untreated control in reducing the pod damage. Higher dose of insecticide gave better grain yield as compared to its lower dose. Lambda-cyhalothrin at 50 g a.i./ha recorded the maximum yield of 13.75 q/ha. In terms of incremental cost benefit ratio (ICBR), beta-cyfluthrin 25 g a.i./ha treatment gave fairly high ratio (1 : 9.22) closely followed by its lower dose (1 : 7.01).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both insecticides (beta-cyfluthrin and lambda-cyhalothrin) reduced pod damage in chickpea relative to untreated control in a field trial.

Taxon
chick peaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
beta-cyfluthrin and lambda-cyhalothrine0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damagee1
Direction
reducinge1
Comparator
untreated controle1
Setting
field triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of beta-cyfluthrin and lambda-cyhalothrin against Helicoverpa armigera in chick pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both the insecticides were found superior to untreated control in reducing the pod damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher dose of insecticide gave better grain yield in chickpea than its lower dose.

Taxon
chick peaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Higher dose of insecticidee2
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
its lower dosee2
Setting
field triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of beta-cyfluthrin and lambda-cyhalothrin against Helicoverpa armigera in chick pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher dose of insecticide gave better grain yield as compared to its lower dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalothrin at 50 g a.i./ha gave the maximum chickpea yield of 13.75 q/ha.

Taxon
chick peaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Lambda-cyhalothrin at 50 g a.i./hae3
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Value
13.75 q/hae3
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of beta-cyfluthrin and lambda-cyhalothrin against Helicoverpa armigera in chick pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e3

“Lambda-cyhalothrin at 50 g a.i./ha recorded the maximum yield of 13.75 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beta-cyfluthrin at 25 g a.i./ha gave a fairly high incremental cost benefit ratio of 1 : 9.22 in chickpea, higher than its lower dose (1 : 7.01).

Taxon
chick peaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
beta-cyfluthrin 25 g a.i./hae4
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe4
Direction
highe4
Value
1 : 9.22e4
Comparator
its lower dosee4
Setting
field triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of beta-cyfluthrin and lambda-cyhalothrin against Helicoverpa armigera in chick pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e4

“In terms of incremental cost benefit ratio (ICBR), beta-cyfluthrin 25 g a.i./ha treatment gave fairly high ratio (1 : 9.22) closely followed by its lower dose (1 : 7.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–557 · show in text ↑

lambda-cyhalothrin · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.