insecticide · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)
23 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 17
- positive
- positive
- positive
Estimation of yield losses by pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea. · 2010
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
Effect of insecticides on management of Helicoverpa armigera in Chick pea agro-ecosystem · 2014
- positive
Effect of insecticides against Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner on Chick pea in Field · 2016
- positive
Efficacy of insecticides in controlling pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) infesting chickpea · 2017
- positive
- positive
Efficacy of insecticides in controlling pod borer (Helicoverpa Armigera Hubner) infesting Chickpea · 2017
- positive
- positive
Bio-efficacy of fruit extracts against gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in chickpea · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.