Paper · 1992 · Indian journal of plant protection

Integration of pesticide application schedules for disease and insect pest management in chickpea under dryland conditions

S. K. Singh; Sezanur Rahman; B.R. Gupta; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In field experiments at Pulse Research Station, Samba an integrated pesticide spray schedule provided better control of blight (Ascochyta rabiei), stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiomm), dry root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola), wilt (Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. ciceri) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) than any of the simple treatment. Higher yields were obtained in the treatments where carbendazim + thiram treated seeds were planted and later sprayed with 2 sprays of monocrotophos or endosulf an. Both these treatments provided economic management of diseases and pod borer with net profit of Rs.3368 and Rs.3290, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated pesticide spraying controlled blight better than simple treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated pesticide spray schedulee0
Interactor
Ascochyta rabieiAscochyta rabieie0pathogen
Outcome
blighte0
Direction
better controle0
Comparator
simple treatmente0
Setting
Pulse Research Station, Sambae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ascochyta rabiei
Ascochyta rabiei · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDr. Weidong Chen Research Plant Pathologist · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“an integrated pesticide spray schedule provided better control of blight (Ascochyta rabiei), stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiomm), dry root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola), wilt (Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. ciceri) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) than any of the simple treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Pulse Research Station, Samba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated pesticide spraying controlled stem rot better than simple treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated pesticide spray schedulee0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiomme0pathogen
Outcome
stem rote0
Direction
better controle0
Comparator
simple treatmente0
Setting
Pulse Research Station, Sambae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“an integrated pesticide spray schedule provided better control of blight (Ascochyta rabiei), stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiomm), dry root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola), wilt (Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. ciceri) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) than any of the simple treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Pulse Research Station, Samba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated pesticide spraying controlled dry root rot better than simple treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated pesticide spray schedulee0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
dry root rote0
Direction
better controle0
Comparator
simple treatmente0
Setting
Pulse Research Station, Sambae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“an integrated pesticide spray schedule provided better control of blight (Ascochyta rabiei), stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiomm), dry root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola), wilt (Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. ciceri) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) than any of the simple treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Pulse Research Station, Samba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated pesticide spraying controlled wilt better than simple treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated pesticide spray schedulee0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. cicerie0pathogen
Outcome
wilte0
Direction
better controle0
Comparator
simple treatmente0
Setting
Pulse Research Station, Sambae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“an integrated pesticide spray schedule provided better control of blight (Ascochyta rabiei), stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiomm), dry root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola), wilt (Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. ciceri) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) than any of the simple treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Pulse Research Station, Samba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated pesticide spraying controlled pod borer better than simple treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated pesticide spray schedulee0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod borere0
Direction
better controle0
Comparator
simple treatmente0
Setting
Pulse Research Station, Sambae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“an integrated pesticide spray schedule provided better control of blight (Ascochyta rabiei), stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiomm), dry root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola), wilt (Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. ciceri) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) than any of the simple treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Pulse Research Station, Samba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment followed by monocrotophos sprays gave higher chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
monocrotophose0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
carbendazim + thiram treated seedse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher yields were obtained in the treatments where carbendazim + thiram treated seeds were planted and later sprayed with 2 sprays of monocrotophos or endosulf an.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment followed by endosulf an sprays gave higher chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
endosulf ane0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
carbendazim + thiram treated seedse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher yields were obtained in the treatments where carbendazim + thiram treated seeds were planted and later sprayed with 2 sprays of monocrotophos or endosulf an.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The monocrotophos schedule yielded net profit of Rs.3368.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
monocrotophose0
Outcome
net profite1
Value
Rs.3368e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher yields were obtained in the treatments where carbendazim + thiram treated seeds were planted and later sprayed with 2 sprays of monocrotophos or endosulf an.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both these treatments provided economic management of diseases and pod borer with net profit of Rs.3368 and Rs.3290, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–627 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The endosulf an schedule yielded net profit of Rs.3290.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
endosulf ane0
Outcome
net profite1
Value
Rs.3290e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher yields were obtained in the treatments where carbendazim + thiram treated seeds were planted and later sprayed with 2 sprays of monocrotophos or endosulf an.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both these treatments provided economic management of diseases and pod borer with net profit of Rs.3368 and Rs.3290, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–627 · show in text ↑

monocrotophos · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Ascochyta rabiei · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

insecticide · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

insecticide · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.