Paper · 2014 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Effect of insecticides on management of Helicoverpa armigera in Chick pea agro-ecosystem

Salman Ahmad; M. Shafiq Ansari; Mazhar Husain

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The initial infestation of Helicoverpa armigera occurred in second week of February and reached its peak in middle of March. The population of moths in the pheromone trap varied from week to week in all the three years of the study. Applications of the insecticides were made according to ETL of H. armigera. The egg count as well as larval mortality was significantly decreased over control with all the insecticides tested after the treatment. Pods damage due to H. armigera was as high as 38.5, 33.2 and 58.8% during first, second and third year, respectively in the untreated plots. The yield of chick pea was found to be negatively correlated in relation to the pod damage. The maximum reduction in the larval count was recorded in the plots treated with neem oil and NPV in the first year as compared to the other insecticides tested after 3 days of the application, while during third cropping year, NPV was proved to be significantly efficient in bringing the larval count to 40 larvae per 10 plants. All the insecticides proved to be effective in increasing the yield of chick pea over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested insecticides significantly decreased egg count and larval mortality over control.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
insecticidese1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
egg count as well as larval mortalitye1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea agro-ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The initial infestation of Helicoverpa armigera occurred in second week of February and reached its peak in middle of March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“The egg count as well as larval mortality was significantly decreased over control with all the insecticides tested after the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod damage by Helicoverpa armigera in untreated plots was 38.5, 33.2 and 58.8 percent in the three years.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae2pest
Outcome
Pods damagee2
Value
38.5, 33.2 and 58.8%e2
Comparator
untreated plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea agro-ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pods damage due to H. armigera was as high as 38.5, 33.2 and 58.8% during first, second and third year, respectively in the untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–585 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea yield was negatively correlated with pod damage.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
pode3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
negatively correlatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea agro-ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“The yield of chick pea was found to be negatively correlated in relation to the pod damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil and NPV gave the maximum reduction in larval count in the first year, compared with other insecticides after 3 days.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
neem oil and NPVe4
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
NPVe4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
reduction in the larval counte4
Direction
maximume4
Qualifier
after 3 days of the applicatione4
Comparator
other insecticides testede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea agro-ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The initial infestation of Helicoverpa armigera occurred in second week of February and reached its peak in middle of March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum reduction in the larval count was recorded in the plots treated with neem oil and NPV in the first year as compared to the other insecticides tested after 3 days of the application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV brought the larval count to 40 larvae per 10 plants in the third cropping year.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NPVe5
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
NPVe5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larval counte5
Value
40 larvae per 10 plantse5
Qualifier
third cropping yeare5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea agro-ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The initial infestation of Helicoverpa armigera occurred in second week of February and reached its peak in middle of March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“while during third cropping year, NPV was proved to be significantly efficient in bringing the larval count to 40 larvae per 10 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticides were effective in increasing chickpea yield over control.

Taxon
chick peaCicer arietinume6
Treatment
insecticidese6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
increasinge6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea agro-ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
e6

“All the insecticides proved to be effective in increasing the yield of chick pea over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth population in the pheromone trap varied from week to week in all three years.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
population of moths in the pheromone trape7
Qualifier
varied from week to weeke7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea agro-ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
e7

“The population of moths in the pheromone trap varied from week to week in all the three years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–231 · show in text ↑
e0

“The initial infestation of Helicoverpa armigera occurred in second week of February and reached its peak in middle of March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial infestation of Helicoverpa armigera occurred in the second week of February and peaked in mid-March.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
initial infestatione0
Value
second week of Februarye0
Qualifier
reached its peak in middle of Marche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea agro-ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The initial infestation of Helicoverpa armigera occurred in second week of February and reached its peak in middle of March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

insecticide · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

botanical · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.