Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)

1. cypermethrinPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Beauveria bassianaPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. endosulfanPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. quinalphosPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. azadirachtinPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. novaluronPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. Allium sativumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. MetarhiziumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. Trichogramma chilonisPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. adjuvantPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. fipronilPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. spinosadResults agree23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. indoxacarbResults agree18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. chlorantraniliproleResults agree15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. emamectin benzoateResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. Azadirachta indicaResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. Coriandrum sativumResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. flubendiamideResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. chlorpyrifosResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. monocrotophosResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. fenvalerateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. pheromoneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. profenofosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. Carthamus tinctoriusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. Hordeum vulgareResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. acephateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. deltamethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. lufenuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. malathionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
35. malic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
36. tracerResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. botanicalPositive and negative results25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect
38. insecticidePositive and negative results18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect
39. applicationPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
40. transgenicPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
41. sowing timePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
42. biocontrolResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. intercroppingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. ipmResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
45. stageResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
46. trap barrierResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
47. infectionResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
48. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.