Abstract
The results showed that all the seven insecticides performed well in reduction of larval population and increase in chick pea yield. Spinosad, chlorpyrifos and quinalphos were found superior over all the treatments after first and second spray, respectively. Malathion was found as least effective insecticide against gram pod borer. The highest yield was registered in spinosad 45 SC about 19.25 q/ha which were followed by chlorpyrifos 20 EC 16.45 q/ha and quinalphos 14.30q/ha compared to 5.25 q/ha yield in untreated check.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
All seven insecticides reduced Helicoverpa armigera larval population on chick pea.
- Taxon
- chick pea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- seven insecticidese1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerat0pest - Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- reductione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“all the seven insecticides performed well in reduction of larval population and increase in chick pea yield”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera Hübner”
t1“Chick pea”
Claim · model-written summary
All seven insecticides increased chick pea yield.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- seven insecticidese1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“all the seven insecticides performed well in reduction of larval population and increase in chick pea yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad was superior to all other treatments against Helicoverpa armigera on chick pea after the first spray.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt1
- Treatment
- Spinosade1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- superiore1
- Direction
- superiore1
- Qualifier
- after first and second spray, respectivelye1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Spinosad, chlorpyrifos and quinalphos were found superior over all the treatments after first and second spray, respectively”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera Hübner”
t1“Chick pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyrifos was superior to all other treatments against Helicoverpa armigera on chick pea after the second spray.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt1
- Treatment
- chlorpyrifose1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- superiore1
- Direction
- superiore1
- Qualifier
- after first and second spray, respectivelye1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Spinosad, chlorpyrifos and quinalphos were found superior over all the treatments after first and second spray, respectively”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera Hübner”
t1“Chick pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos was superior to all other treatments against Helicoverpa armigera on chick pea after the second spray.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt1
- Treatment
- quinalphose1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- superiore1
- Direction
- superiore1
- Qualifier
- after first and second spray, respectivelye1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Spinosad, chlorpyrifos and quinalphos were found superior over all the treatments after first and second spray, respectively”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera Hübner”
t1“Chick pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Malathion was the least effective insecticide against Helicoverpa armigera on chick pea.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt1
- Treatment
- Malathione3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- least effectivee3
- Direction
- least effectivee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Malathion was found as least effective insecticide against gram pod borer”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera Hübner”
t1“Chick pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 SC gave the highest chick pea yield, 19.25 q/ha, against 5.25 q/ha in the untreated check.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt1
- Treatment
- spinosad 45 SCe4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 19.25 q/hae4
- Qualifier
- compared to 5.25 q/ha yield in untreated checke4
- Comparator
- untreated checke4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The highest yield was registered in spinosad 45 SC about 19.25 q/ha which were followed by chlorpyrifos 20 EC 16.45 q/ha and quinalphos 14.30q/ha compared to 5.25 q/ha yield in untreated check”
t1“Chick pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyrifos 20 EC gave the second-highest chick pea yield, 16.45 q/ha.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt1
- Treatment
- chlorpyrifos 20 ECe4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- followed bye4
- Value
- 16.45 q/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The highest yield was registered in spinosad 45 SC about 19.25 q/ha which were followed by chlorpyrifos 20 EC 16.45 q/ha and quinalphos 14.30q/ha compared to 5.25 q/ha yield in untreated check”
t1“Chick pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos gave a chick pea yield of 14.30 q/ha, after spinosad and chlorpyrifos.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt1
- Treatment
- quinalphose4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- followed bye4
- Value
- 14.30q/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The highest yield was registered in spinosad 45 SC about 19.25 q/ha which were followed by chlorpyrifos 20 EC 16.45 q/ha and quinalphos 14.30q/ha compared to 5.25 q/ha yield in untreated check”
t1“Chick pea”
The same questions in other papers
quinalphos · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
quinalphos · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →chlorpyrifos · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →malathion · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
chlorpyrifos · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →spinosad · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
22 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →insecticide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.