Paper · 2010 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Field efficacy of different insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting chickpea.

S. G. Deshmukh; B. V. Sureja; D. M. Jethva; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to determine the efficacy of different insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting chickpea at Junagadh Agricultural University campus, Junagadh during rabi season of 2008-09. The results revealed that flubendiamide 0.007 per cent, indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent, spinosad 0.009 per cent and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent were found the most effective in reducing the H. armigera population and pod damage of chickpea. The highest yield was also recorded in the treatment of flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1850 kg/ha) followed by indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1805 kg/ha), spinosad 0.009 per cent (1760 kg/ha) and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent (1665 kg/ha). The highest cost benefit ratio was obtained in the treatment of indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1: 7.08), followed by flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1:6.10) and spinosad 0.009 per cent (1:5.24). Thus, considering the cost benefit ratio, any one of these insecticides spray at 50 per cent flowering and second at 15 days after first spray can be suggested for the effective control of gram pod borer on chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 0.007 per cent was among the most effective insecticides in reducing Helicoverpa armigera population and pod damage in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
flubendiamide 0.007 per cente1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
H. armigera population and pod damagee1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that flubendiamide 0.007 per cent, indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent, spinosad 0.009 per cent and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent were found the most effective in reducing the H. armigera population and pod damage of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent was among the most effective insecticides in reducing Helicoverpa armigera population and pod damage in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
indoxacarb 0.0075 per cente1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
H. armigera population and pod damagee1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that flubendiamide 0.007 per cent, indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent, spinosad 0.009 per cent and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent were found the most effective in reducing the H. armigera population and pod damage of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 0.009 per cent was among the most effective insecticides in reducing Helicoverpa armigera population and pod damage in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
spinosad 0.009 per cente1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
H. armigera population and pod damagee1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that flubendiamide 0.007 per cent, indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent, spinosad 0.009 per cent and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent were found the most effective in reducing the H. armigera population and pod damage of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent was among the most effective insecticides in reducing Helicoverpa armigera population and pod damage in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cente1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
H. armigera population and pod damagee1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that flubendiamide 0.007 per cent, indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent, spinosad 0.009 per cent and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent were found the most effective in reducing the H. armigera population and pod damage of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 0.007 per cent gave the highest chickpea yield (1850 kg/ha).

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
flubendiamide 0.007 per cente2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1850 kg/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield was also recorded in the treatment of flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1850 kg/ha) followed by indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1805 kg/ha), spinosad 0.009 per cent (1760 kg/ha) and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent (1665 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent gave a chickpea yield of 1805 kg/ha, lower than flubendiamide.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
indoxacarb 0.0075 per cente2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
1805 kg/hae2
Comparator
flubendiamide 0.007 per cente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield was also recorded in the treatment of flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1850 kg/ha) followed by indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1805 kg/ha), spinosad 0.009 per cent (1760 kg/ha) and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent (1665 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 0.009 per cent gave a chickpea yield of 1760 kg/ha, lower than flubendiamide.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
spinosad 0.009 per cente2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
1760 kg/hae2
Comparator
flubendiamide 0.007 per cente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield was also recorded in the treatment of flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1850 kg/ha) followed by indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1805 kg/ha), spinosad 0.009 per cent (1760 kg/ha) and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent (1665 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent gave a chickpea yield of 1665 kg/ha, lower than flubendiamide.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cente2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
1665 kg/hae2
Comparator
flubendiamide 0.007 per cente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield was also recorded in the treatment of flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1850 kg/ha) followed by indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1805 kg/ha), spinosad 0.009 per cent (1760 kg/ha) and emamectin benzoate 0.0015 per cent (1665 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent gave the highest cost benefit ratio (1: 7.08) in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
indoxacarb 0.0075 per cente3
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
1: 7.08e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest cost benefit ratio was obtained in the treatment of indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1: 7.08), followed by flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1:6.10) and spinosad 0.009 per cent (1:5.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 0.007 per cent gave a cost benefit ratio of 1:6.10, lower than indoxacarb.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
flubendiamide 0.007 per cente3
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
1:6.10e3
Comparator
indoxacarb 0.0075 per cente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest cost benefit ratio was obtained in the treatment of indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1: 7.08), followed by flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1:6.10) and spinosad 0.009 per cent (1:5.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 0.009 per cent gave a cost benefit ratio of 1:5.24, lower than indoxacarb.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
spinosad 0.009 per cente3
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
1:5.24e3
Comparator
indoxacarb 0.0075 per cente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest cost benefit ratio was obtained in the treatment of indoxacarb 0.0075 per cent (1: 7.08), followed by flubendiamide 0.007 per cent (1:6.10) and spinosad 0.009 per cent (1:5.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–899 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest spraying one of these insecticides at 50% flowering and a second spray 15 days later for effective control of gram pod borer on chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Outcome
effective control of gram pod borere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“any one of these insecticides spray at 50 per cent flowering and second at 15 days after first spray can be suggested for the effective control of gram pod borer on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1116 · show in text ↑

indoxacarb · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

flubendiamide · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

flubendiamide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

emamectin benzoate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

spinosad · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.