Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Indoxacarb had a low cost:benefit ratio of 1: 5.3.

A claim from Bio-efficacy of some insecticides against H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb had a low cost:benefit ratio of 1: 5.3.

Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Outcome
cost:benefit ratioe1
Direction
lowe0
Value
1: 5.3e0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“while low in treatment indoxacarb (1: 5.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1171
e1

“The cost:benefit ratio was high in treatment fipronil (1: 8.2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1128

Title

Bio-efficacy of some insecticides against H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

P. S. Singh; R.K. Shukla; Nikhil Yadav Journal of Food Legumes 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e6df902b15eb9ed51ae8f9c79667913e0462e53deceff531e0537d72878af648 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

indoxacarb · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.