Abstract
A field study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of five insecticides viz., Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC, Novaluron 10 EC, Clothianidin 50 WDG, Indoxacarb 14.5 SC and Quinalphos 25 EC (standard check) against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera H.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) variety Pratap Channa-1. Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC gave the highest reduction in the larval population of pod borer and was found statically at par with Indoxacarb 14.5 SC. The next effective treatments were Clothianidin 50 WDG and Quinalphos 25 EC, However, Novaluron 10 EC @ 750ml/ha proved to be the least effective treatment as it resulted in lowest per cent reduction in the larval population. Highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.10 was obtained from Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC followed by Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1: 1.65). The next cost effective treatment in terms of CBR was Quinalphos 25 EC (1:1.64), whereas, Novaluron 10 EC (1:1.15) and Clothianidin 50 WDG @ 500g/ha (1:0.66) could not show any conspicuous gain over cost.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC gave the highest reduction in the larval population of pod borer on chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Lambdacyhalothrin 5 ECe0
- Interactor
- pod borere0pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- highest reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC gave the highest reduction in the larval population of pod borer and was found statically at par with Indoxacarb 14.5 SC”
Claim · model-written summary
Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC was statistically at par with Indoxacarb 14.5 SC in reducing the larval population of pod borer.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Lambdacyhalothrin 5 ECe0
- Interactor
- pod borere0pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- Indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC gave the highest reduction in the larval population of pod borer and was found statically at par with Indoxacarb 14.5 SC”
Claim · model-written summary
Clothianidin 50 WDG was among the next most effective treatments against pod borer.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Clothianidin 50 WDGe0
- Outcome
- next effective treatmentse0
- Direction
- next effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“The next effective treatments were Clothianidin 50 WDG and Quinalphos 25 EC”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos 25 EC was among the next most effective treatments against pod borer.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Quinalphos 25 ECe0
- Outcome
- next effective treatmentse0
- Direction
- next effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“The next effective treatments were Clothianidin 50 WDG and Quinalphos 25 EC”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron 10 EC at 750 ml/ha was the least effective treatment, giving the lowest per cent reduction in larval population.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Novaluron 10 EC @ 750ml/hae0
- Outcome
- per cent reduction in the larval populatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Novaluron 10 EC @ 750ml/ha proved to be the least effective treatment as it resulted in lowest per cent reduction in the larval population”
Claim · model-written summary
Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC gave the highest cost benefit ratio, 1:2.10.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Lambdacyhalothrin 5 ECe0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 1:2.10e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.10 was obtained from Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC followed by Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1: 1.65)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb 14.5 SC gave the next highest cost benefit ratio, 1:1.65.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1: 1.65e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.10 was obtained from Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC followed by Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1: 1.65)”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos 25 EC gave the next cost-effective result, a CBR of 1:1.64.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Quinalphos 25 ECe0
- Outcome
- CBRe0
- Direction
- next cost effectivee0
- Value
- 1:1.64e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“The next cost effective treatment in terms of CBR was Quinalphos 25 EC (1:1.64)”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron 10 EC (CBR 1:1.15) did not show any conspicuous gain over cost.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Novaluron 10 ECe0
- Outcome
- conspicuous gain over coste0
- Direction
- could not showe0
- Value
- 1:1.15e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Novaluron 10 EC (1:1.15) and Clothianidin 50 WDG @ 500g/ha (1:0.66) could not show any conspicuous gain over cost”
Claim · model-written summary
Clothianidin 50 WDG at 500 g/ha (CBR 1:0.66) did not show any conspicuous gain over cost.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Clothianidin 50 WDG @ 500g/hae0
- Outcome
- conspicuous gain over coste0
- Direction
- could not showe0
- Value
- 1:0.66e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Novaluron 10 EC (1:1.15) and Clothianidin 50 WDG @ 500g/ha (1:0.66) could not show any conspicuous gain over cost”
The same questions in other papers
novaluron · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
clothianidin · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
novaluron · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
indoxacarb · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →lambda-cyhalothrin · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
lambda-cyhalothrin · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.