Paper · 2016 · Indian journal of plant protection

Bioefficacy of novaluron 10EC in combination with urea against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea

Roshan Lal; Babu Lal Jat

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experimental trials were conducted on the compatibility of urea 2% with insecticides of different groups viz., monocrotophos 36SL @ 500 ml/ha, cypermethrin 25EC @ 125 ml/ha, quinalphos 25EC @ 1000 ml/ha and novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha against larval population of Helicoverpa armigera in the field conditions on chickpea cultivar “HC-1” during Rabi season 2011–12 and 2012–13 at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana). These insecticides were found compatible with urea. Minimum larval population of H. armigera was recorded in novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha at 3, 7 and 10 days after spraying. Monocrotophos 36SL @ 500 ml/ha, quinalphos 25EC @ 1000 ml/ha and cypermethrin 25EC @ 125 ml/ha could not provide consistent results against H. armigera. The larval population, pod damage and incidence were statistically at par with insecticides and their combination. No phytotoxicity effect was observed on the leaves with urea application in combination with insecticides. Minimum per cent pod damage (7.3%), maximum grain yield (14.6 q/ha) and monetary returns ( 6265/ha) was realized from novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha plus 2% urea as compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron 10EC at 375 ml/ha gave the minimum larval population of Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/hae1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval populatione1
Direction
Minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Minimum larval population of H. armigera was recorded in novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha at 3, 7 and 10 days after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrotophos, quinalphos and cypermethrin could not provide consistent control of Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Monocrotophos 36SL @ 500 ml/ha, quinalphos 25EC @ 1000 ml/ha and cypermethrin 25EC @ 125 ml/hae2
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae2pest
Outcome
consistent resultse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Monocrotophos 36SL @ 500 ml/ha, quinalphos 25EC @ 1000 ml/ha and cypermethrin 25EC @ 125 ml/ha could not provide consistent results against H. armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–755 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticides were compatible with urea in chickpea field trials.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
ureae3
Outcome
compatiblee3
Qualifier
with ureae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–95 · show in text ↑
e3

“These insecticides were found compatible with urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–482 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No phytotoxicity effect was observed on chickpea leaves with urea combined with insecticides.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
urea application in combination with insecticidese4
Outcome
phytotoxicity effecte4
Qualifier
on the leavese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–95 · show in text ↑
e4

“No phytotoxicity effect was observed on the leaves with urea application in combination with insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–977 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval population, pod damage and incidence were statistically at par with insecticides and their combination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
larval population, pod damage and incidencee5
Qualifier
statistically at par with insecticides and their combinatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–95 · show in text ↑
e5

“The larval population, pod damage and incidence were statistically at par with insecticides and their combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron 10EC plus 2% urea gave the minimum pod damage (7.3%) in chickpea compared with other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha plus 2% ureae6
Outcome
pod damagee6
Direction
Minimume6
Value
7.3%e6
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“Minimum per cent pod damage (7.3%), maximum grain yield (14.6 q/ha) and monetary returns ( 6265/ha) was realized from novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha plus 2% urea as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron 10EC plus 2% urea gave the maximum grain yield (14.6 q/ha) in chickpea compared with other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha plus 2% ureae6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
maximume6
Value
14.6 q/hae6
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“Minimum per cent pod damage (7.3%), maximum grain yield (14.6 q/ha) and monetary returns ( 6265/ha) was realized from novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha plus 2% urea as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron 10EC plus 2% urea gave the maximum monetary returns (6265/ha) in chickpea compared with other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha plus 2% ureae6
Outcome
monetary returnse6
Direction
maximume6
Value
6265/hae6
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“Minimum per cent pod damage (7.3%), maximum grain yield (14.6 q/ha) and monetary returns ( 6265/ha) was realized from novaluron 10EC @ 375 ml/ha plus 2% urea as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1168 · show in text ↑

novaluron · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

novaluron · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

novaluron · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.