Paper · 2018 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Evaluation of bio-pesticides and indoxacarb against gram pod borer on chickpea

RK Meena; AR Naqvi; DS Meena; et al.

14
claims
32
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment conducted during rabi, 2015-16 to evaluate the efficacy of bio-pesticides and indoxacarb against gram pod borer on chickpea from six treatments viz., Indoxacarb, Bacillus thuringiensis, Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus, NSKE, Azadirachtin and Garlic extract. The indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.0 ml/lit.) was found most effective in crop protection. NSKE (5.0 ml/ha), azadirachtin 0.3 EC (5.0 ml/lit.), HaNPV (250 LE/ha) and B. thuringiensis (1000 ml/ha) were found moderately effective in reducing pod borer population, while garlic extract (10 ml/lit.) was found least effective. The minimum pod damage (4.69%) was recorded in treatment of indoxacarb followed by NSKE (10.41%) and azadirachtin (10.84%). The maximum pod damage (14.27%) was found in garlic extract treatment, while it was 20.95% in control. The maximum seed yield was obtained in the treatment of indoxacarb 14.5 SC (16.49 q/ha) whereas it was minimum in garlic extract (10.10 q/ha) treatment. Maximum B:C ratio was obtained in the treatment indoxacarb (9.52), while minimum in garlic extract (0.17).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5 SC was the most effective crop-protection treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.0 ml/lit.)e0
Interactor
gram pod borert0pest
Outcome
crop protectione0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.0 ml/lit.) was found most effective in crop protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–347 · show in text ↑
t0

“gram pod borer on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE was moderately effective against pod borer population.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NSKE (5.0 ml/ha)e0
Interactor
pod borere0pest
Outcome
pod borer populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NSKE (5.0 ml/ha), azadirachtin 0.3 EC (5.0 ml/lit.), HaNPV (250 LE/ha) and B. thuringiensis (1000 ml/ha) were found moderately effective in reducing pod borer population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin was moderately effective in reducing pod borer population.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
azadirachtin 0.3 EC (5.0 ml/lit.)e0
Interactor
pod borere0pest
Outcome
pod borer populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“azadirachtin 0.3 EC (5.0 ml/lit.), HaNPV (250 LE/ha) and B. thuringiensis (1000 ml/ha) were found moderately effective in reducing pod borer population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HaNPV was moderately effective in reducing pod borer population.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
HaNPV (250 LE/ha)e0
Interactor
pod borere0pest
Outcome
pod borer populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HaNPV (250 LE/ha) and B. thuringiensis (1000 ml/ha) were found moderately effective in reducing pod borer population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis was moderately effective in reducing pod borer population.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
B. thuringiensis (1000 ml/ha)e0
Interactor
pod borere0pest
Second interactor
B. thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pod borer populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. thuringiensis (1000 ml/ha) were found moderately effective in reducing pod borer population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract was least effective against pod borer.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
garlic extract (10 ml/lit.)e0
Interactor
gram pod borert0pest
Outcome
least effectivee0
Direction
least effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract (10 ml/lit.) was found least effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“gram pod borer on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb had the minimum pod damage of 4.69%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Interactor
gram pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
4.69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum pod damage (4.69%) was recorded in treatment of indoxacarb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“gram pod borer on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE had pod damage of 10.41%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NSKEe0
Interactor
gram pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee1
Value
10.41%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by NSKE (10.41%) and azadirachtin (10.84%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–703 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum pod damage (4.69%) was recorded in treatment of indoxacarb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“gram pod borer on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin had pod damage of 10.84%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
azadirachtine0
Interactor
gram pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee1
Value
10.84%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by NSKE (10.41%) and azadirachtin (10.84%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–703 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum pod damage (4.69%) was recorded in treatment of indoxacarb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“gram pod borer on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract had the maximum pod damage of 14.27%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
garlic extracte0
Interactor
gram pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.27%e0
Qualifier
20.95%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum pod damage (14.27%) was found in garlic extract treatment, while it was 20.95% in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“gram pod borer on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb produced the maximum seed yield of 16.49 q/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
16.49 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed yield was obtained in the treatment of indoxacarb 14.5 SC (16.49 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract produced the minimum seed yield of 10.10 q/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
garlic extracte0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
minimume0
Value
10.10 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas it was minimum in garlic extract (10.10 q/ha) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum seed yield was obtained in the treatment of indoxacarb 14.5 SC (16.49 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb had the maximum B:C ratio of 9.52.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
9.52e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum B:C ratio was obtained in the treatment indoxacarb (9.52)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract had the minimum B:C ratio of 0.17.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
garlic extracte0
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while minimum in garlic extract (0.17)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum B:C ratio was obtained in the treatment indoxacarb (9.52)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Allium sativum · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

azadirachtin · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

botanical · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.