Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

A novel study on efficacy of animal urine against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at Pantnagar, Uttarakhand

Ajaykumara Km; Ruchira Tiwari

16
claims
56
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A novel and preliminary field study was conducted on the efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18. The pooled data for both the years clearly showed that all the treatments were found significantly superior over control. The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained for Indoxacarb (14.5 SC) @ 0.9ml/l (3.34larvae/plant, 11.38% and 15.15q/ha) showed that the chemical was performed the best among the treatments followed by Desi cow urine (4.50larvae/plant, 13.00%, 12.92q/ha), Horse urine(4.33 larvae /plant), 13.97%, 12.55q/ha) and Goat urine (5.83larvae/plant,15.65%,12.25q/ha) in comparison to untreated control (19.34larvae/plant, 38.70%, 5.51q/ha). On the other hand, the mean population of pupae of parasitoid, Campoletis chloridae was recorded the least (0.78/plant) in Indoxacarb and significantly more per plant (2.42.2.42 and 2.00) in Desi cow urine, Horse urine and Goat urine treated plots, respectively. Thus, the present novel study clearly revealed that animal urine can safely and effectively be incorporated in integrated pest management schedule against Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All animal urine treatments and the chemical control were significantly superior to the untreated control against H. armigera on chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
animal urinee0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
mean larval population, pod damage and grain yielde2
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb at 0.9 ml/l gave a mean larval population of 3.34 larvae per plant on chickpea, below the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Indoxacarb (14.5 SC) @ 0.9ml/le3
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
mean larval populatione2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
3.34larvae/plante3
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indoxacarb (14.5 SC) @ 0.9ml/l (3.34larvae/plant, 11.38% and 15.15q/ha) showed that the chemical was performed the best among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb at 0.9 ml/l gave 11.38% pod damage on chickpea, below the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Indoxacarb (14.5 SC) @ 0.9ml/le3
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damagee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
11.38%e3
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indoxacarb (14.5 SC) @ 0.9ml/l (3.34larvae/plant, 11.38% and 15.15q/ha) showed that the chemical was performed the best among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb at 0.9 ml/l gave 15.15 q/ha grain yield on chickpea, above the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Indoxacarb (14.5 SC) @ 0.9ml/le3
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
15.15q/hae3
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indoxacarb (14.5 SC) @ 0.9ml/l (3.34larvae/plant, 11.38% and 15.15q/ha) showed that the chemical was performed the best among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desi cow urine gave a mean larval population of 4.50 larvae per plant on chickpea, below the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Desi cow urinee4
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
mean larval populatione2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
4.50larvae/plante4
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e4

“Desi cow urine (4.50larvae/plant, 13.00%, 12.92q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desi cow urine gave 13.00% pod damage on chickpea, below the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Desi cow urinee4
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damagee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
13.00%e4
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e4

“Desi cow urine (4.50larvae/plant, 13.00%, 12.92q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desi cow urine gave 12.92 q/ha grain yield on chickpea, above the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Desi cow urinee4
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
12.92q/hae4
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e4

“Desi cow urine (4.50larvae/plant, 13.00%, 12.92q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horse urine gave a mean larval population of 4.33 larvae per plant on chickpea, below the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Horse urinee5
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
mean larval populatione2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
4.33 larvae /plante5
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e5

“Horse urine(4.33 larvae /plant), 13.97%, 12.55q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horse urine gave 13.97% pod damage on chickpea, below the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Horse urinee5
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damagee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
13.97%e5
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e5

“Horse urine(4.33 larvae /plant), 13.97%, 12.55q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horse urine gave 12.55 q/ha grain yield on chickpea, above the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Horse urinee5
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
12.55q/hae5
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e5

“Horse urine(4.33 larvae /plant), 13.97%, 12.55q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat urine gave a mean larval population of 5.83 larvae per plant on chickpea, below the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Goat urinee6
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
mean larval populatione2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
5.83larvae/plante6
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e6

“Goat urine (5.83larvae/plant,15.65%,12.25q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat urine gave 15.65% pod damage on chickpea, below the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Goat urinee6
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damagee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
15.65%e6
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e6

“Goat urine (5.83larvae/plant,15.65%,12.25q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat urine gave 12.25 q/ha grain yield on chickpea, above the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Goat urinee6
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
12.25q/hae6
Comparator
controle1
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–366 · show in text ↑
e2

“The data on mean larval population, pod damage and grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–443 · show in text ↑
e6

“Goat urine (5.83larvae/plant,15.65%,12.25q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb recorded the lowest population of the parasitoid Campoletis chloridae (pupae) on chickpea, at 0.78 per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Indoxacarbe7
Interactor
Campoletis chloridaee7biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
mean population of pupae of parasitoide7
Direction
leaste7
Value
0.78/plante7
Comparator
Desi cow urine, Horse urine and Goat urinee7
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · Second interactorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e7

“the mean population of pupae of parasitoid, Campoletis chloridae was recorded the least (0.78/plant) in Indoxacarb and significantly more per plant (2.42.2.42 and 2.00) in Desi cow urine, Horse urine and Goat urine treated plots, respectively. Thus, the present novel study clearly revealed that animal urine can safely and effectively be incorporated in integrated pest management schedule against Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Desi cow urine, Horse urine and Goat urine significantly increased the pupae of the parasitoid Campoletis chloridae per plant on chickpea, compared with Indoxacarb.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Desi cow urine, Horse urine and Goat urinee7
Interactor
Campoletis chloridaee7biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
mean population of pupae of parasitoide7
Direction
moree7
Value
2.42.2.42 and 2.00e7
Comparator
Indoxacarbe7
Setting
experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · Second interactorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of animal urine against gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hubner) on chickpea at experimental farm NEBCRC, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during rabi crop seasons of 2016-17 and 17-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–244 · show in text ↑
e7

“the mean population of pupae of parasitoid, Campoletis chloridae was recorded the least (0.78/plant) in Indoxacarb and significantly more per plant (2.42.2.42 and 2.00) in Desi cow urine, Horse urine and Goat urine treated plots, respectively. Thus, the present novel study clearly revealed that animal urine can safely and effectively be incorporated in integrated pest management schedule against Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1282 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Animal urine can safely and effectively be incorporated into an integrated pest management schedule against H. armigera on chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Treatment
animal urinee7
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae7pest
Outcome
integrated pest management schedulee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the mean population of pupae of parasitoid, Campoletis chloridae was recorded the least (0.78/plant) in Indoxacarb and significantly more per plant (2.42.2.42 and 2.00) in Desi cow urine, Horse urine and Goat urine treated plots, respectively. Thus, the present novel study clearly revealed that animal urine can safely and effectively be incorporated in integrated pest management schedule against Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1282 · show in text ↑

indoxacarb · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.