Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Biological Control Against the Cowpea Weevil (Callosobruchus Chinensis L., Coleoptera: Bruchidae) Using Essential Oils of Some Medicinal Plants

Righi Assia Fatiha; Righi Kada; Anouar Khelil; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is a valuable foodstuff but unfortunately this legume is prone to insect attacks from the chick pea weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis L.). This serious pest damages the chickpea and causes decreases in the yield and in the nutritional quality. Biological control is being used to deal with this problem. We tried different doses of the essential oils of three new medicinal plants, namely Salvia verbenaca L., Scilla maritima L., and Artemisia herba-alba Asso to limit the damage of the chick pea weevil pest, and to protect consumer’s health. To determine the effect and efficiency of the oil, the tests were conducted using the different biological parameters of fertility, longevity, and fecundity, under controlled temperature and relative humidity (28°C and 75%). The effectiveness of organic oils was demonstrated. We tested these oils on the germination of seeds. The obtained results showed that the tested plant oils have a real organic insecticide effect. The essential oil of Artemisia proved most effective as a biocide; achieving a mortality rate of 100%. A significant reduction in longevity was observed under the effect of 30 μl of S. maritima (1.3 days) and S. verbenaca (2.8, 4.6 days), respectively, for males and females compared to 8 and 15 days for the control. For fecundity, an inhibition of oviposition was obtained using 30 μl of Salvia and Scilla essential oils. The test on the seed germination using different essential oils, showed no damage to the germinating seeds. The germination rate was 99%. These findings suggest that the tested plants can be used as a bioinsecticide for control of the C. chinensis pest of stored products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested plant oils had insecticidal activity against the chickpea weevil.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
tested plant oilse0
Outcome
organic insecticide effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tested plant oils have a real organic insecticide effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artemisia oil achieved 100% weevil mortality.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
essential oil of Artemisiae0
Outcome
mortality ratee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The essential oil of Artemisia proved most effective as a biocide; achieving a mortality rate of 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty microliters of S. maritima significantly shortened male weevil longevity to 1.3 days.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
30 μl of S. maritimae0
Outcome
longevitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
1.3 dayse0
Qualifier
malese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant reduction in longevity was observed under the effect of 30 μl of S. maritima (1.3 days) and S. verbenaca (2.8, 4.6 days), respectively, for males and females compared to 8 and 15 days for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty microliters of S. verbenaca significantly shortened male longevity to 2.8 days.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
S. verbenacae0
Outcome
longevitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
2.8e0
Qualifier
malese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant reduction in longevity was observed under the effect of 30 μl of S. maritima (1.3 days) and S. verbenaca (2.8, 4.6 days), respectively, for males and females compared to 8 and 15 days for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty microliters of S. verbenaca significantly shortened female longevity to 4.6 days.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
S. verbenacae0
Outcome
longevitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
4.6 dayse0
Qualifier
femalese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant reduction in longevity was observed under the effect of 30 μl of S. maritima (1.3 days) and S. verbenaca (2.8, 4.6 days), respectively, for males and females compared to 8 and 15 days for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salvia oil at 30 μl inhibited oviposition.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
30 μl of Salviae0
Outcome
ovipositione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an inhibition of oviposition was obtained using 30 μl of Salvia and Scilla essential oils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scilla oil at 30 μl inhibited oviposition.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Scilla essential oilse0
Outcome
ovipositione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an inhibition of oviposition was obtained using 30 μl of Salvia and Scilla essential oils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oils did not damage germinating chickpea seeds; germination was 99%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
different essential oilse0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
no damagee0
Value
99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The test on the seed germination using different essential oils, showed no damage to the germinating seeds. The germination rate was 99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1564 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest these plants as bioinsecticides for stored-product C. chinensis control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
used as a bioinsecticide for control of the C. chinensis pest of stored productse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These findings suggest that the tested plants can be used as a bioinsecticide for control of the C. chinensis pest of stored products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

botanical · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 44 positive, 28 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.