Abstract
An experiment was conducted in Rabi season during 2014-2015 study the relative efficacy of different among all the treatments lowest number of gram pod borer was recorded in Spinosad (2.85). The next followed treatment was Chlorpyriphos (3.40), which was also statistically at par with Quinolphos (3.69), Cypermethrin (3.95). Remaining treatments are Fipronil (4.45) and Indoxcarb (4.63) were statistically at par Malathion (5.25) was recorded as least effective within the chemical insecticides. A maximum net return was recorded in T5 Spinosad (17.45 q/ha), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (16.24 q/ha), T2 Quinolphos (15.35q/ha), T1 Cypermethrin (13.92 q/ha), T4 Fipronil (12.20 q/ha), T7 Indoxcarb (11.90 q/ha), T6 Malathion (9.26 q/ha) as compared to control T0 plane water (7.25q/h). When cost benefit ratio was worked out, interesting result was achieved. Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T5 Spinosad (1:3.40), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (1:3.03), T2 Quinolphos (1:2.99), T1 Cypermethrin (1:2.71), T4 Fipronil (1:2.36), T7 Indoxcarb (1:2.30), T6 Malathion (1:1.81) as compared to control T0 plane water Control (1:1.46).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad had a reported gram pod borer count of 2.85.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Spinosade0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerat0pest - Outcome
- number of gram pod borere0
- Value
- 2.85e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“lowest number of gram pod borer was recorded in Spinosad (2.85). The next followed treatment was Chlorpyriphos (3.40), which was also statistically at par with Quinolphos (3.69), Cypermethrin (3.95). Remaining treatments are Fipronil (4.45) and Indoxcarb (4.63) were statistically at par Malathion (5.25) was recorded as least effective within the chemical insecticides.”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos had a reported gram pod borer count of 3.40.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorpyriphose0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- number of gram pod borere0
- Value
- 3.40e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest number of gram pod borer was recorded in Spinosad (2.85). The next followed treatment was Chlorpyriphos (3.40), which was also statistically at par with Quinolphos (3.69), Cypermethrin (3.95). Remaining treatments are Fipronil (4.45) and Indoxcarb (4.63) were statistically at par Malathion (5.25) was recorded as least effective within the chemical insecticides.”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinolphos had a reported gram pod borer count of 3.69.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Quinolphose0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- number of gram pod borere0
- Value
- 3.69e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest number of gram pod borer was recorded in Spinosad (2.85). The next followed treatment was Chlorpyriphos (3.40), which was also statistically at par with Quinolphos (3.69), Cypermethrin (3.95). Remaining treatments are Fipronil (4.45) and Indoxcarb (4.63) were statistically at par Malathion (5.25) was recorded as least effective within the chemical insecticides.”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cypermethrin had a reported gram pod borer count of 3.95.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Cypermethrine0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- number of gram pod borere0
- Value
- 3.95e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest number of gram pod borer was recorded in Spinosad (2.85). The next followed treatment was Chlorpyriphos (3.40), which was also statistically at par with Quinolphos (3.69), Cypermethrin (3.95). Remaining treatments are Fipronil (4.45) and Indoxcarb (4.63) were statistically at par Malathion (5.25) was recorded as least effective within the chemical insecticides.”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil had a reported gram pod borer count of 4.45.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Fipronile0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- number of gram pod borere0
- Value
- 4.45e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest number of gram pod borer was recorded in Spinosad (2.85). The next followed treatment was Chlorpyriphos (3.40), which was also statistically at par with Quinolphos (3.69), Cypermethrin (3.95). Remaining treatments are Fipronil (4.45) and Indoxcarb (4.63) were statistically at par Malathion (5.25) was recorded as least effective within the chemical insecticides.”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxcarb had a reported gram pod borer count of 4.63.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxcarbe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- number of gram pod borere0
- Value
- 4.63e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest number of gram pod borer was recorded in Spinosad (2.85). The next followed treatment was Chlorpyriphos (3.40), which was also statistically at par with Quinolphos (3.69), Cypermethrin (3.95). Remaining treatments are Fipronil (4.45) and Indoxcarb (4.63) were statistically at par Malathion (5.25) was recorded as least effective within the chemical insecticides.”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Malathion had a reported gram pod borer count of 5.25.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Malathione0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- number of gram pod borere0
- Value
- 5.25e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest number of gram pod borer was recorded in Spinosad (2.85). The next followed treatment was Chlorpyriphos (3.40), which was also statistically at par with Quinolphos (3.69), Cypermethrin (3.95). Remaining treatments are Fipronil (4.45) and Indoxcarb (4.63) were statistically at par Malathion (5.25) was recorded as least effective within the chemical insecticides.”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad produced net return of 17.45 q/ha, above the water control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Spinosade0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 17.45 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 7.25q/he0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum net return was recorded in T5 Spinosad (17.45 q/ha), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (16.24 q/ha), T2 Quinolphos (15.35q/ha), T1 Cypermethrin (13.92 q/ha), T4 Fipronil (12.20 q/ha), T7 Indoxcarb (11.90 q/ha), T6 Malathion (9.26 q/ha) as compared to control T0 plane water (7.25q/h).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos produced net return of 16.24 q/ha, above the water control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorpyriphose0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- 16.24 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 7.25q/he0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum net return was recorded in T5 Spinosad (17.45 q/ha), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (16.24 q/ha), T2 Quinolphos (15.35q/ha), T1 Cypermethrin (13.92 q/ha), T4 Fipronil (12.20 q/ha), T7 Indoxcarb (11.90 q/ha), T6 Malathion (9.26 q/ha) as compared to control T0 plane water (7.25q/h).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinolphos produced net return of 15.35q/ha, above the water control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Quinolphose0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- 15.35q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 7.25q/he0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum net return was recorded in T5 Spinosad (17.45 q/ha), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (16.24 q/ha), T2 Quinolphos (15.35q/ha), T1 Cypermethrin (13.92 q/ha), T4 Fipronil (12.20 q/ha), T7 Indoxcarb (11.90 q/ha), T6 Malathion (9.26 q/ha) as compared to control T0 plane water (7.25q/h).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cypermethrin produced net return of 13.92 q/ha, above the water control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Cypermethrine0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- 13.92 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 7.25q/he0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum net return was recorded in T5 Spinosad (17.45 q/ha), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (16.24 q/ha), T2 Quinolphos (15.35q/ha), T1 Cypermethrin (13.92 q/ha), T4 Fipronil (12.20 q/ha), T7 Indoxcarb (11.90 q/ha), T6 Malathion (9.26 q/ha) as compared to control T0 plane water (7.25q/h).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil produced net return of 12.20 q/ha, above the water control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Fipronile0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- 12.20 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 7.25q/he0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum net return was recorded in T5 Spinosad (17.45 q/ha), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (16.24 q/ha), T2 Quinolphos (15.35q/ha), T1 Cypermethrin (13.92 q/ha), T4 Fipronil (12.20 q/ha), T7 Indoxcarb (11.90 q/ha), T6 Malathion (9.26 q/ha) as compared to control T0 plane water (7.25q/h).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxcarb produced net return of 11.90 q/ha, above the water control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxcarbe0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- 11.90 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 7.25q/he0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum net return was recorded in T5 Spinosad (17.45 q/ha), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (16.24 q/ha), T2 Quinolphos (15.35q/ha), T1 Cypermethrin (13.92 q/ha), T4 Fipronil (12.20 q/ha), T7 Indoxcarb (11.90 q/ha), T6 Malathion (9.26 q/ha) as compared to control T0 plane water (7.25q/h).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Malathion produced net return of 9.26 q/ha, above the water control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Malathione0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- 9.26 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 7.25q/he0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum net return was recorded in T5 Spinosad (17.45 q/ha), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (16.24 q/ha), T2 Quinolphos (15.35q/ha), T1 Cypermethrin (13.92 q/ha), T4 Fipronil (12.20 q/ha), T7 Indoxcarb (11.90 q/ha), T6 Malathion (9.26 q/ha) as compared to control T0 plane water (7.25q/h).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad had a cost benefit ratio of 1:3.40.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Spinosade0
- Outcome
- most economical treatmente0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 1:3.40e0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best and most economical treatment was T5 Spinosad (1:3.40), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (1:3.03), T2 Quinolphos (1:2.99), T1 Cypermethrin (1:2.71), T4 Fipronil (1:2.36), T7 Indoxcarb (1:2.30), T6 Malathion (1:1.81) as compared to control T0 plane water Control (1:1.46).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos had a cost benefit ratio of 1:3.03.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorpyriphose0
- Outcome
- most economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:3.03e0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best and most economical treatment was T5 Spinosad (1:3.40), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (1:3.03), T2 Quinolphos (1:2.99), T1 Cypermethrin (1:2.71), T4 Fipronil (1:2.36), T7 Indoxcarb (1:2.30), T6 Malathion (1:1.81) as compared to control T0 plane water Control (1:1.46).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinolphos had a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.99.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Quinolphose0
- Outcome
- most economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:2.99e0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best and most economical treatment was T5 Spinosad (1:3.40), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (1:3.03), T2 Quinolphos (1:2.99), T1 Cypermethrin (1:2.71), T4 Fipronil (1:2.36), T7 Indoxcarb (1:2.30), T6 Malathion (1:1.81) as compared to control T0 plane water Control (1:1.46).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cypermethrin had a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.71.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Cypermethrine0
- Outcome
- most economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:2.71e0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best and most economical treatment was T5 Spinosad (1:3.40), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (1:3.03), T2 Quinolphos (1:2.99), T1 Cypermethrin (1:2.71), T4 Fipronil (1:2.36), T7 Indoxcarb (1:2.30), T6 Malathion (1:1.81) as compared to control T0 plane water Control (1:1.46).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil had a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.36.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Fipronile0
- Outcome
- most economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:2.36e0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best and most economical treatment was T5 Spinosad (1:3.40), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (1:3.03), T2 Quinolphos (1:2.99), T1 Cypermethrin (1:2.71), T4 Fipronil (1:2.36), T7 Indoxcarb (1:2.30), T6 Malathion (1:1.81) as compared to control T0 plane water Control (1:1.46).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxcarb had a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.30.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxcarbe0
- Outcome
- most economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:2.30e0
- Comparator
- control T0 plane watere0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best and most economical treatment was T5 Spinosad (1:3.40), followed by T3 Chlorpyriphos (1:3.03), T2 Quinolphos (1:2.99), T1 Cypermethrin (1:2.71), T4 Fipronil (1:2.36), T7 Indoxcarb (1:2.30), T6 Malathion (1:1.81) as compared to control T0 plane water Control (1:1.46).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
cypermethrin · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fipronil · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
chlorpyrifos · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →cypermethrin · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →malathion · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
fipronil · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
chlorpyrifos · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →spinosad · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.