Paper · 1996 · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics)

Evaluation of Insecticide Mixtures for Controlling Helicoverpa armigera on Chickpea

Sanjit Kumar Pal; V.S.R. Das; N.J. Armes

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a field experiment in 1995-96 in Andhra Pradesh with chickpeas, the control of Helicoverpa armigera with Spark (deltamethrin 1% + triazophos 35%), Polytrin-C (cypermethrin 4% + profenofos 40%), cypermethrin, Delfin WG (bioinsecticide made with Bacillus thuringiensis) or cypermethrin + Delfin WG was evaluated. The most effective treatments were Spark and Polytrin-C. Cypermethrin, with and without the bioinsecticide, was ineffective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spark was among the most effective treatments for controlling Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Sparke0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Helicoverpa armigera on Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The most effective treatments were Spark and Polytrin-C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polytrin-C was among the most effective treatments for controlling Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Polytrin-Ce0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Helicoverpa armigera on Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“The most effective treatments were Spark and Polytrin-C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin, with and without the Delfin WG bioinsecticide, was ineffective against Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Cypermethrin, with and without the bioinsecticidee0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
ineffectivee0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Helicoverpa armigera on Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cypermethrin, with and without the bioinsecticide, was ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–437 · show in text ↑

cypermethrin · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.