Abstract
Field study was conducted to determine the insecticides and biopesticides were applied as foliar spray to manage the infestation of gram pod borer of chick pea. The insecticides were applied when there was appearance of gram pod borer, average population from 0.1-1.1 per plant. Estimation of losses in yield due to infestation by gram pod borer of chick pea in Kabirdham district. The efficacy of insecticides, Biopesticides and Bird perchar on mean caterpillar population differed considerably. The mean number of gram pod borer before spray varied from 0.1-1.1 per plant but when the treatments were applied there was drastic reduction in overall mean population of gram pod bore. The gram pod borer overall mean population was considerably less in replication RI, overall mean population 0.18 per plant which was treated in Endosulphan. RII, overall mean population 0.17 per plant which was treated in Chlorpyriphos + Cypermethrin (Super D). RIII, overall mean population 0.13 per plant which was treated in Endosulphan. However, the gram pod borer overall mean population was maximum in RI, 0.33 per plant which was NPV treated as compared to 0.38 per plant mean population of gram pod borer in control. RII, 0.28 per plant which was Azadirachtin (Neemplex) and Bird perchar treated as compared to 0.31 per plant mean population of gram pod borer in control. RIII, 0.36 per plant which was Bird preacher treated as compared to 0.41 per plant mean population of gram pod borer in control. The Overall mean population of gram pod borer in RI, RII and RIII, was minimum 0.17 per plant Endosulphan treated as compared to 0.37 per plant overall mean population of gram pod borer in control. The effect of insecticide/ bio insecticides and bird preacher on mean yield in qt. /ha is also varied greatly. The mean yield in qt. /ha was maximum 5qt./ha which was Quinalphos treated while minimum was 4.33qt./ha which was Endosulphan treated as compared to 3.78qt./ha yield in control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Endosulphan treated RI had 0.18 borers per plant.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Endosulphane0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerat0pest - Outcome
- populatione0
- Value
- 0.18 per plante0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Helicoverpa armigera) of chickpea”
e0“overall mean population 0.18 per plant which was treated in Endosulphan”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos + Cypermethrin treated RII had 0.17 borers per plant.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorpyriphos + Cypermethrin (Super D)e0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Value
- 0.17 per plante0
- Qualifier
- RIIe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Helicoverpa armigera) of chickpea”
e0“RII, overall mean population 0.17 per plant which was treated in Chlorpyriphos + Cypermethrin (Super D)”
Claim · model-written summary
Endosulphan treated RIII had 0.13 borers per plant.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Endosulphane0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Value
- 0.13 per plante0
- Qualifier
- RIIIe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Helicoverpa armigera) of chickpea”
e0“RIII, overall mean population 0.13 per plant which was treated in Endosulphan”
Claim · model-written summary
NPV treated RI had 0.33 borers per plant versus 0.38 in control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- NPVe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 0.33 per plante0
- Qualifier
- 0.38 per plante0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Helicoverpa armigera) of chickpea”
e0“maximum in RI, 0.33 per plant which was NPV treated as compared to 0.38 per plant mean population of gram pod borer in control”
Claim · model-written summary
Azadirachtin and bird perchar treated RII had 0.28 borers per plant versus 0.31 in control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Azadirachtin (Neemplex) and Bird perchare0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Value
- 0.28 per plante0
- Qualifier
- 0.31 per plante0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Helicoverpa armigera) of chickpea”
e0“RII, 0.28 per plant which was Azadirachtin (Neemplex) and Bird perchar treated as compared to 0.31 per plant mean population of gram pod borer in control”
Claim · model-written summary
Bird preacher treated RIII had 0.36 borers per plant versus 0.41 in control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Bird preachere0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Value
- 0.36 per plante0
- Qualifier
- 0.41 per plante0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Helicoverpa armigera) of chickpea”
e0“RIII, 0.36 per plant which was Bird preacher treated as compared to 0.41 per plant mean population of gram pod borer in control”
Claim · model-written summary
Endosulphan gave the minimum overall borer population, 0.17 per plant, versus 0.37 in control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Endosulphane0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 0.17 per plante0
- Qualifier
- 0.37 per plante0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Helicoverpa armigera) of chickpea”
e0“minimum 0.17 per plant Endosulphan treated as compared to 0.37 per plant overall mean population of gram pod borer in control”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos yielded 5qt./ha, the maximum, versus 3.78qt./ha in control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Quinalphose0
- Outcome
- mean yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 5qt./hae0
- Qualifier
- 3.78qt./hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“mean yield in qt. /ha was maximum 5qt./ha which was Quinalphos treated while minimum was 4.33qt./ha which was Endosulphan treated as compared to 3.78qt./ha yield in control”
Claim · model-written summary
Endosulphan yielded 4.33qt./ha, the minimum among treatments, versus 3.78qt./ha in control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Endosulphane0
- Outcome
- mean yielde0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 4.33qt./hae0
- Qualifier
- 3.78qt./hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“mean yield in qt. /ha was maximum 5qt./ha which was Quinalphos treated while minimum was 4.33qt./ha which was Endosulphan treated as compared to 3.78qt./ha yield in control”
The same questions in other papers
quinalphos · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
azadirachtin · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →cypermethrin · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →chlorpyrifos · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.