Paper · 2010 · Journal of Crop and Weed

Long term herbicide usage on weed shift and productivity in transplanted finger millet-groundnut cropping system in southern Karnataka.

T. V. R. Prasad; V. K. K. Kumar; G. R. Denesh; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was initiated during Kharif, 1999 with finger millet as first crop followed by groundnut in summer season at the Main Research Station, Hebbal, Bengaluru to know the long term effect of herbicide usage in the same piece of land on weed shift and yield of crops during 1999 to 2008. The pooled data of nine finger millet crops from 1999 to 2007 Kharif indicated that application of butachlor at 0. 75 kg ai/ha more or less gave similar grain yield (3533 kg/ha) to hand weeding twice (3395 kg/ha), due to good control of weeds. Similarly over nine groundnut crops, pod yield obtained in plots applied with pendimethalin at 1.0 kg ai/ha (2160 kg/ha) was similar to hand weeding twice (2094 kg/ha). Continuous application of alachlor 1.0 kg ai/ha in groundnut and 2,4-D EE 0.75 kg ai/ha infinger millet paved way for dominance of grasses particularly Digitaria marginata, Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Echinochloa colona, while use of pendimethalin treated plot showed higher emergence of Commelina benghalensis. Further plot applied with FYM +fertilizer gave slightly higher yield as compared to plot applied with fertilizer alone in groundnut finger millet cropping system. A saving of weeding cost to an extent of Rs. 6810 to 6980/ha in finger millet and Rs. 3018 to 3910/ha was observed in groundnut by using herbicides as compared to hand weeding. None of the herbicides affected the establishment, growth and yield of succeeding crops over past nine years, in spite of herbicides being applied continuously on the same piece of land.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor produced finger millet grain yield similar to hand weeding.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
butachlor at 0. 75 kg ai/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Value
3533 kg/hae0
Qualifier
3395 kg/hae0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“finger millet crops from 1999 to 2007 Kharif indicated that application of butachlor at 0. 75 kg ai/ha more or less gave similar grain yield (3533 kg/ha) to hand weeding twice (3395 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin produced groundnut pod yield similar to hand weeding.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
pendimethalin at 1.0 kg ai/hae0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
similare0
Value
2160 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2094 kg/hae0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut crops, pod yield obtained in plots applied with pendimethalin at 1.0 kg ai/ha (2160 kg/ha) was similar to hand weeding twice (2094 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous alachlor favored three grasses in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
alachlor 1.0 kg ai/hae0
Interactor
Digitaria marginatae0weed
Outcome
dominance of grassese0
Direction
dominancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous application of alachlor 1.0 kg ai/ha in groundnut and 2,4-D EE 0.75 kg ai/ha infinger millet paved way for dominance of grasses particularly Digitaria marginata, Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Echinochloa colona”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin favored emergence of Commelina benghalensis.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
pendimethaline0
Interactor
Commelina benghalensisCommelina benghalensise0weed
Outcome
emergence of Commelina benghalensise0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Commelina benghalensis
Commelina benghalensis · InteractorHerb Pilcher, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“pendimethalin treated plot showed higher emergence of Commelina benghalensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus fertilizer gave slightly higher yield than fertilizer alone.

Taxon
finger millet-groundnutt0
Treatment
FYM +fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet-groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“FYM +fertilizer gave slightly higher yield as compared to plot applied with fertilizer alone in groundnut finger millet cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides saved Rs. 6810 to 6980/ha in finger millet weeding costs.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
herbicidese1
Outcome
weeding coste0
Direction
savinge3
Value
Rs. 6810 to 6980/hae0
Comparator
hand weedinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“weeding cost to an extent of Rs. 6810 to 6980/ha in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rs. 3018 to 3910/ha was observed in groundnut by using herbicides as compared to hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1365 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rs. 3018 to 3910/ha was observed in groundnut by using herbicides as compared to hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1365 · show in text ↑
e3

“A saving of weeding cost to an extent of Rs. 6810 to 6980/ha in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides saved Rs. 3018 to 3910/ha in groundnut weeding costs.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Outcome
weeding coste1
Direction
savinge2
Value
Rs. 3018 to 3910/hae0
Comparator
hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rs. 3018 to 3910/ha was observed in groundnut by using herbicides as compared to hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“A saving of weeding cost to an extent of Rs. 6810 to 6980/ha in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1267 · show in text ↑
e2

“A saving of weeding cost to an extent of Rs. 6810 to 6980/ha in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No herbicide affected succeeding crop establishment, growth or yield.

Taxon
finger millet-groundnutt0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Outcome
establishment, growth and yield of succeeding cropse0
Direction
None of the herbicides affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet-groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“None of the herbicides affected the establishment, growth and yield of succeeding crops over past nine years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1475 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

62 papers: 60 positive, 2 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

butachlor · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

230 papers: 172 positive, 58 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

226 papers more in this group

See all 230 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.