Paper · 2003 · Journal of New Seeds

Two Years of Insect Protected Bt Transgenic Cotton in Argentina

Mirta Graciela Elena De Bianconi

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractA comparative analysis of conventional and insect protected or “Bt” cotton varieties in farmers fields in the Argentine cotton production area during the 1999/00 and 2000/01 growing seasons was conducted. Use of Bt cotton provided farmers with benefits such as increased crop yields and a considerable reduction in the number of insecticide applications. The average additional benefit obtained in both growing seasons was 57.98 $/ha, equivalent to 16 US$ (July 2002).Key Words: Transgenic Bt cottoneconomic benefitdirect cost incomesinsecticide useArgentina

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton increased crop yields relative to conventional cotton in farmers fields.

Treatment
Bt cottone1
Outcome
crop yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
conventionale0
Setting
farmers fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A comparative analysis of conventional and insect protected or “Bt” cotton varieties in farmers fields in the Argentine cotton production area during the 1999/00 and 2000/01 growing seasons was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of Bt cotton provided farmers with benefits such as increased crop yields and a considerable reduction in the number of insecticide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton reduced the number of insecticide applications relative to conventional cotton.

Treatment
Bt cottone1
Outcome
number of insecticide applicationse1
Direction
reductione1
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A comparative analysis of conventional and insect protected or “Bt” cotton varieties in farmers fields in the Argentine cotton production area during the 1999/00 and 2000/01 growing seasons was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of Bt cotton provided farmers with benefits such as increased crop yields and a considerable reduction in the number of insecticide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–361 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average additional benefit of Bt cotton was 57.98 $/ha, equivalent to 16 US$.

Outcome
average additional benefite2
Value
57.98 $/hae2
Setting
Argentine cotton production areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The average additional benefit obtained in both growing seasons was 57.98 $/ha, equivalent to 16 US$ (July 2002)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–475 · show in text ↑
e0

“A comparative analysis of conventional and insect protected or “Bt” cotton varieties in farmers fields in the Argentine cotton production area during the 1999/00 and 2000/01 growing seasons was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–211 · show in text ↑

transgenic · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

transgenic · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 74 positive, 4 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.