Abstract
Development of new agricultural industries in northern Australia is seen as a way to provide food security in the face of reduced water availability in existing regions in the south. This report aims to identify some of the possible economic consequences of developing a rice industry in the Burdekin region, while there is a reduction of output in the Riverina. Annual rice production in the Riverina peaked at 1.7 M tonnes, but the long-term outlook, given climate change impacts on that region and government water buy-backs, is more likely to be less than 800,000 tonnes. Growers are highly efficient water users by international standards, but the ability to offset an anticipated reduction in water availability through further efficiency gains is limited. In recent years growers in the Riverina have diversified their farms to a greater extent and secondary production systems include beef, sheep and wheat. Production in north Queensland is in its infancy, but a potentially suitable farming system has been developed by including rice within the sugarcane system without competition and in fact contributing to the production of sugar by increasing yields and controlling weeds. The economic outcomes are estimated a large scale, dynamic, computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the world economy (Tasman Global), scaled down to regional level. CGE models mimic the workings of the economy through a system of interdependent behavioural and accounting equations which are linked to an input-output database. When an economic shock or change is applied to a model, each of the markets adjusts according to the set of behavioural parameters which are underpinned by economic theory. In this study the model is driven by reducing production in the Riverina in accordance with relationships found between water availability and the production of rice and replacement by other crops and by increasing ride production in the Burdekin. Three scenarios were considered: • Scenario 1: Rice is grown using the fallow period between the last ratoon crop of sugarcane and the new planting. In this scenario there is no competition between rice and sugarcane • Scenario 2: Rice displaces sugarcane production • Scenario 3: Rice is grown on additional land and does not compete with sugarcane. Two time periods were used, 2030 and 2070, which are the conventional time points to consider climate change impacts. Under scenario 1, real economic output declines in the Riverina by $45 \nmillion in 2030 and by $139 million in 2070. This is only partially offset by the increased real economic output in the Burdekin of $35 million and $131 million respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Rice in the sugarcane system increases sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- including rice within the sugarcane systeme0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Setting
- north Queenslande0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Production in north Queensland is in its infancy, but a potentially suitable farming system has been developed by including rice within the sugarcane system without competition and in fact contributing to the production of sugar by increasing yields and controlling weeds.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice in the sugarcane system controls weeds.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- including rice within the sugarcane systeme0
- Outcome
- weedse0
- Direction
- controllinge0
- Setting
- north Queenslande0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Production in north Queensland is in its infancy, but a potentially suitable farming system has been developed by including rice within the sugarcane system without competition and in fact contributing to the production of sugar by increasing yields and controlling weeds.”
Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario 1, Riverina real output declines $45 million in 2030.
- Outcome
- real economic outpute0
- Direction
- declinese0
- Value
- $45 \nmillione0
- Qualifier
- 2030e0
- Setting
- Riverinae0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Under scenario 1, real economic output declines in the Riverina by $45 \nmillion in 2030 and by $139 million in 2070.”
Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario 1, Riverina real output declines $139 million in 2070.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Under scenario 1, real economic output declines in the Riverina by $45 \nmillion in 2030 and by $139 million in 2070.”
Claim · model-written summary
Burdekin real output increases $35 million in 2030.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“This is only partially offset by the increased real economic output in the Burdekin of $35 million and $131 million respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Burdekin real output increases $131 million in 2070.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“This is only partially offset by the increased real economic output in the Burdekin of $35 million and $131 million respectively.”
The same questions in other papers
Oryza sativa · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.