Paper · 2008

Studies on Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Through Diversification of Existing Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Based Cropping System in North-West Plain Zone of India

Rajesh Kumar

8
claims
33
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were undertaken for three consecutive seasons (1999-2001, 2000-2002 and 2001-2003) at the research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur- 242001 (U.P.), to enhance the productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) through the diversification of existing rice (Oryza sativa L.)- wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori and Paol.) cropping system. Experimental results indicated that rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequence (T ) being statistically at par with rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in mid October) + 5 potato (T ), produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination %, no. of shoots, dry matter 6 accumulation in plants and leaves, leaf area index, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio), yield contributing characters (no. of millable canes and cane length, weight and girth) and yield of cane as compared to other crop sequences in the study. The cane yield obtained under T crop sequence (94.66 t ha ) was higher to the tune 5 1 of 40.90%, 26.35%, 21.76%, 24.18% and 16.70%, respectively than that of T (rice-wheat-late cane), T 12 (rice-mustard-spring cane), T (rice-potato-spring cane), T (rice-toria-spring cane) and T (rice-sugarcane + 34 7 potato) crop sequences. Cane equivalent yield (CEY) and economic analysis revealed that the higher CEY (176.14 and 169.38 t ha ), net profit (Rs. 98678 and 92451 ha ), production efficiency (Rs. 152.28 and 11

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice-sugarcane-potato sequence with September-end relay sugarcane had significantly higher germination %, number of shoots and dry matter than other crop sequences.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequencee1
Outcome
germination %, no. of shoots, dry mattere2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other crop sequences in the studye3
Setting
research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpure0

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–514 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination %, no. of shoots, dry matter 6 accumulation in plants and leaves, leaf area index, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–834 · show in text ↑
e3

“yield contributing characters (no. of millable canes and cane length, weight and girth) and yield of cane as compared to other crop sequences in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–990 · show in text ↑
e0

“at the research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur- 242001 (U.P.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence had significantly higher leaf area index, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio than other crop sequences.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequencee1
Outcome
leaf area index, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other crop sequences in the studye3
Setting
research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpure0

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–514 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination %, no. of shoots, dry matter 6 accumulation in plants and leaves, leaf area index, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–834 · show in text ↑
e3

“yield contributing characters (no. of millable canes and cane length, weight and girth) and yield of cane as compared to other crop sequences in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–990 · show in text ↑
e0

“at the research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur- 242001 (U.P.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence had significantly higher number of millable canes and cane length than other crop sequences.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequencee1
Outcome
no. of millable canes and cane lengthe3
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other crop sequences in the studye3
Setting
research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpure0

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–514 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination %, no. of shoots, dry matter 6 accumulation in plants and leaves, leaf area index, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–834 · show in text ↑
e3

“yield contributing characters (no. of millable canes and cane length, weight and girth) and yield of cane as compared to other crop sequences in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–990 · show in text ↑
e0

“at the research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur- 242001 (U.P.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence had significantly higher cane weight and girth than other crop sequences.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequencee1
Outcome
weight and girthe3
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other crop sequences in the studye3
Setting
research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpure0

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–514 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination %, no. of shoots, dry matter 6 accumulation in plants and leaves, leaf area index, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–834 · show in text ↑
e3

“yield contributing characters (no. of millable canes and cane length, weight and girth) and yield of cane as compared to other crop sequences in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–990 · show in text ↑
e0

“at the research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur- 242001 (U.P.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence yielded 94.66 t/ha of cane, 16.70% to 40.90% higher than other sequences.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequencee1
Outcome
cane yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
94.66 t hae4
Qualifier
40.90%, 26.35%, 21.76%, 24.18% and 16.70%e4
Comparator
other crop sequences in the studye3
Setting
research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpure0

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (skipped rows method)- sugarcane (relay cropped in September end) + potato crop sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–514 · show in text ↑
e4

“The cane yield obtained under T crop sequence (94.66 t ha ) was higher to the tune 5 1 of 40.90%, 26.35%, 21.76%, 24.18% and 16.70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1123 · show in text ↑
e3

“yield contributing characters (no. of millable canes and cane length, weight and girth) and yield of cane as compared to other crop sequences in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–990 · show in text ↑
e0

“at the research farm of U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur- 242001 (U.P.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane equivalent yield was higher, at 176.14 and 169.38 t/ha for the top sequences.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
Cane equivalent yield (CEY)e5
Direction
highere5
Value
176.14 and 169.38 t hae5

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cane equivalent yield (CEY) and economic analysis revealed that the higher CEY (176.14 and 169.38 t ha )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1423 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net profit was higher, at Rs. 98678 and 92451 per ha, for the top sequences.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
net profite6
Direction
highere5
Value
Rs. 98678 and 92451e6

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cane equivalent yield (CEY) and economic analysis revealed that the higher CEY (176.14 and 169.38 t ha )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1423 · show in text ↑
e6

“net profit (Rs. 98678 and 92451 ha )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1461 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production efficiency was higher, at Rs. 152.28 per unit, for the top sequences.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
production efficiencye7
Direction
highere5
Value
Rs. 152.28e7

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Productivity of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cane equivalent yield (CEY) and economic analysis revealed that the higher CEY (176.14 and 169.38 t ha )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1423 · show in text ↑
e7

“production efficiency (Rs. 152.28 and 11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1503 · show in text ↑

Solanum tuberosum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Oryza sativa · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Solanum tuberosum · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

rotation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

rotation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.