Paper · 2011 · Progressive Horticulture

Production potential of winter vegetables as intercrops in autumn planted sugarcane under valley conditions of Uttarakhand

Sanjay Kumar; Shalini Singh; Adesh Singh

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the year 2007–08 and 2008–09 to find out the most remunerative winter vegetables grown as intercrops with autumn planted sugarcane. Six treatments formulated with intercropping i.e. sugarcane sole, sugarcane+ radish, sugarcane+ onion, sugarcane+ fenugreek, sugarcane+ Frenchbean and sugarcane+ potato in randomized block design. Based on the two years study, onion intercropping was selected as most remunerative in autumn cane with the highest cane equivalent yield (147.9 t/ha) and net return (Rs. 192340) among all the intercropping systems. Sugarcane + potato intercropping was also found comparable with sugarcane+onion produced cane equivalent yield of 147.0 t/ha and net return (Rs. 188680/ha). Whereas, lowest cane equivalent yield and net return recorded under sugarcane+ fenugreek intercropping system among the vegetables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

onion intercropping had highest cane equivalent yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
onion intercroppinge1
Outcome
cane equivalent yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
147.9 t/hae1
Comparator
all the intercropping systemse1

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion intercropping was selected as most remunerative in autumn cane with the highest cane equivalent yield (147.9 t/ha) and net return (Rs. 192340) among all the intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

onion intercropping had highest net return.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
onion intercroppinge1
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
higheste1
Value
Rs. 192340e1
Comparator
all the intercropping systemse1

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion intercropping was selected as most remunerative in autumn cane with the highest cane equivalent yield (147.9 t/ha) and net return (Rs. 192340) among all the intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + potato intercropping had comparable cane equivalent yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Sugarcane + potato intercroppinge1
Outcome
cane equivalent yielde1
Direction
comparablee1
Value
147.0 t/hae1
Comparator
sugarcane+onione1

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane + potato intercropping was also found comparable with sugarcane+onion produced cane equivalent yield of 147.0 t/ha and net return (Rs. 188680/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane + potato intercropping had comparable net return.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Sugarcane + potato intercroppinge1
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
comparablee1
Value
Rs. 188680/hae1
Comparator
sugarcane+onione1

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane + potato intercropping was also found comparable with sugarcane+onion produced cane equivalent yield of 147.0 t/ha and net return (Rs. 188680/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sugarcane+ fenugreek intercropping system had lowest cane equivalent yield and net return.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugarcane+ fenugreek intercropping systeme1
Outcome
cane equivalent yield and net returne1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
the vegetablese1

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowest cane equivalent yield and net return recorded under sugarcane+ fenugreek intercropping system among the vegetables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–873 · show in text ↑

Trigonella foenum-graecum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Solanum tuberosum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Allium cepa · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.