Abstract
SUMMARY Two potato genotypes, Kufri Sindhuri (KS) and Kufri Chandramukhi (KC), were grown in association with sugarcane (cv. Co 1148) at 1:1 (SP) and 1:2 (SPP) sugarcane (S): potato (P)row arrangements. Growth behaviour and yield of both crops in companionship were compared with those of their sole cropping. Initially, KC accumulated more dry matter in tubers than KS. At harvest, the contribution of tubers to total dry matter was the same in both genotypes. However, KS produced significantly higher absolute tuber yields than KC. Potato row arrangements in sugarcane did not significantly affect the proportion of dry matter in different plant components. However, SPP gave significantly higher tuber yields than SP and was the same as with sole potatoes. Drymatter accumulation, canopy development and yield of sugarcane were not affected significantly by potato row arrangements in the companion cropping system. Sugarcane was unaffected by KC in companion cropping but KS exerted an adverse effect on all the growth characters and yield of sugarcane. Similarly, in sequential cropping, sugarcane yielded significantly less when planted after KS than after KC.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Kufri Chandramukhi initially accumulated more tuber dry matter than Kufri Sindhuri.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Material
- KCe0
- Outcome
- dry matter in tuberse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- KSe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Initially, KC accumulated more dry matter in tubers than KS.”
t0“potato”
Claim · model-written summary
At harvest the two genotypes had equal tuber contribution to dry matter.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Material
- genotypese0
- Outcome
- contribution of tubers to total dry mattere0
- Direction
- the samee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At harvest, the contribution of tubers to total dry matter was the same in both genotypes.”
t0“potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Kufri Sindhuri had significantly higher tuber yields than Kufri Chandramukhi.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Material
- KSe0
- Outcome
- absolute tuber yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- KCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“KS produced significantly higher absolute tuber yields than KC.”
t0“potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Potato row arrangement did not significantly affect dry matter proportions.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Treatment
- row arrangementse0
- Outcome
- proportion of dry mattere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Potato row arrangements in sugarcane did not significantly affect the proportion of dry matter in different plant components.”
Claim · model-written summary
SPP gave significantly higher tuber yield than SP.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SPP gave significantly higher tuber yields than SP”
t0“potato”
Claim · model-written summary
SPP tuber yield matched sole potatoes.
- Taxon
- potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
- Treatment
- SPPe0
- Outcome
- tuber yieldse0
- Direction
- the samee0
- Comparator
- sole potatoese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SPP gave significantly higher tuber yields than SP and was the same as with sole potatoes.”
Claim · model-written summary
Potato row arrangements did not significantly affect sugarcane dry matter, canopy development or yield.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- potato row arrangementse0
- Outcome
- Drymatter accumulation, canopy development and yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Drymatter accumulation, canopy development and yield of sugarcane were not affected significantly by potato row arrangements”
Claim · model-written summary
KC companion cropping did not affect sugarcane.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sugarcane was unaffected by KC in companion cropping”
Claim · model-written summary
KS companion cropping adversely affected sugarcane growth and yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“KS exerted an adverse effect on all the growth characters and yield of sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane yielded less after KS than after KC in sequential cropping.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane yielded significantly less when planted after KS than after KC”
The same questions in other papers
Solanum tuberosum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.