Paper · 2020 · Indian Journal of Extension Education

Assessing productivity potentials of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids) based cropping systems in rice (Oryza Sativa L.) growing areas of Indian subtropics

S. N. Singh; J. R. Patnaik; A. K. Sah; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An on-farm trials was conducted for two consecutive seasons of 2008–10 and 2009–11 using a participatory approach on cultivators ’fields at Dhanuwansand village in Lucknow district of India's Central Uttar Pradesh to explore the possibility of enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) through the diversification of existing rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping system which is prevalent in North-West Plain zone of India in many combinations. Experimental results indicated that rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harvest (T5) being statistically at par with rice (skipped row method) + sugarcane (relay intercropped in Mid October) + potato after rice harvest, produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination per cent and number of shoots), number of millable canes and cane yield as compared to other crop sequences in the study. The cane yield obtained under T5 crop sequence (94.66 t/ha) was higher to the tune of 41.34 per cent, 27.18 per cent, 15.15 per cent, 24.18 per cent and 5 17.58 per cent, respectively than that of T1 (rice-wheat-late cane), T2(rice-mustard-spring cane), T3 (rice-potato-spring cane), T4 (rice-toria-spring cane) and T7 (rice-sugarcane + potato) crop sequences. Commercial cane sugar percent and Brix did not alter significantly due to different crop sequence treatments. Thus, in rice growing areas of North-West Plain zone of India, an alternative strategy of planting autumn sugarcane as a relay intercrop with skipped row planted rice in Late September or up to Mid October taking potato as intercrop after harvest of rice can suitably be initiated for reaping higher yield of cane and sugar as well.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T5 sugarcane sequence gave significantly higher growth attributes (germination per cent and number of shoots) than other crop sequences.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harveste3
Outcome
growth attributese2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
germination per cent and number of shootse2
Comparator
other crop sequencese2

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination per cent and number of shoots), number of millable canes and cane yield as compared to other crop sequences in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–944 · show in text ↑
e3

“rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harvest (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T5 sugarcane sequence gave significantly more millable canes than other crop sequences.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harveste3
Outcome
number of millable canese2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other crop sequencese2

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination per cent and number of shoots), number of millable canes and cane yield as compared to other crop sequences in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–944 · show in text ↑
e3

“rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harvest (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T5 sugarcane sequence gave significantly higher cane yield than other crop sequences.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harveste3
Outcome
cane yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other crop sequencese2

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced significantly higher values of growth attributes (germination per cent and number of shoots), number of millable canes and cane yield as compared to other crop sequences in the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–944 · show in text ↑
e3

“rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harvest (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield under the T5 sequence was 41.34 per cent higher than under the rice-wheat-late cane sequence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
T5 crop sequencee5
Outcome
cane yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
41.34 per cente5
Qualifier
94.66 t/hae5
Comparator
rice-wheat-late canee5

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cane yield obtained under T5 crop sequence (94.66 t/ha) was higher to the tune of 41.34 per cent, 27.18 per cent, 15.15 per cent, 24.18 per cent and 5 17.58 per cent, respectively than that of T1 (rice-wheat-late cane), T2(rice-mustard-spring cane), T3 (rice-potato-spring cane), T4 (rice-toria-spring cane) and T7 (rice-sugarcane + potato) crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield under the T5 sequence was 27.18 per cent higher than under the rice-mustard-spring cane sequence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
T5 crop sequencee5
Outcome
cane yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
27.18 per cente5
Qualifier
94.66 t/hae5
Comparator
rice-mustard-spring canee5

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cane yield obtained under T5 crop sequence (94.66 t/ha) was higher to the tune of 41.34 per cent, 27.18 per cent, 15.15 per cent, 24.18 per cent and 5 17.58 per cent, respectively than that of T1 (rice-wheat-late cane), T2(rice-mustard-spring cane), T3 (rice-potato-spring cane), T4 (rice-toria-spring cane) and T7 (rice-sugarcane + potato) crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield under the T5 sequence was 15.15 per cent higher than under the rice-potato-spring cane sequence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
T5 crop sequencee5
Outcome
cane yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
15.15 per cente5
Qualifier
94.66 t/hae5
Comparator
rice-potato-spring canee5

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cane yield obtained under T5 crop sequence (94.66 t/ha) was higher to the tune of 41.34 per cent, 27.18 per cent, 15.15 per cent, 24.18 per cent and 5 17.58 per cent, respectively than that of T1 (rice-wheat-late cane), T2(rice-mustard-spring cane), T3 (rice-potato-spring cane), T4 (rice-toria-spring cane) and T7 (rice-sugarcane + potato) crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield under the T5 sequence was 24.18 per cent higher than under the rice-toria-spring cane sequence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
T5 crop sequencee5
Outcome
cane yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
24.18 per cente5
Qualifier
94.66 t/hae5
Comparator
rice-toria-spring canee5

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cane yield obtained under T5 crop sequence (94.66 t/ha) was higher to the tune of 41.34 per cent, 27.18 per cent, 15.15 per cent, 24.18 per cent and 5 17.58 per cent, respectively than that of T1 (rice-wheat-late cane), T2(rice-mustard-spring cane), T3 (rice-potato-spring cane), T4 (rice-toria-spring cane) and T7 (rice-sugarcane + potato) crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield under the T5 sequence was 17.58 per cent higher than under the rice-sugarcane + potato sequence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
T5 crop sequencee5
Outcome
cane yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
17.58 per cente5
Qualifier
94.66 t/hae5
Comparator
rice-sugarcane + potatoe5

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cane yield obtained under T5 crop sequence (94.66 t/ha) was higher to the tune of 41.34 per cent, 27.18 per cent, 15.15 per cent, 24.18 per cent and 5 17.58 per cent, respectively than that of T1 (rice-wheat-late cane), T2(rice-mustard-spring cane), T3 (rice-potato-spring cane), T4 (rice-toria-spring cane) and T7 (rice-sugarcane + potato) crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T5 sequence was statistically at par with rice + mid-October sugarcane + potato.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harveste3
Outcome
statistically at pare4
Direction
at pare4
Comparator
rice (skipped row method) + sugarcane (relay intercropped in Mid October) + potato after rice harveste4

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e3

“rice (skipped row method) + autumn sugarcane (relay intercropped in Late September) + potato after rice harvest (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–617 · show in text ↑
e4

“being statistically at par with rice (skipped row method) + sugarcane (relay intercropped in Mid October) + potato after rice harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–751 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial cane sugar percent and Brix were not significantly altered by crop sequence treatments.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
different crop sequence treatmentse6
Outcome
Commercial cane sugar percent and Brixe6
Direction
did not alter significantlye6

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
e6

“Commercial cane sugar percent and Brix did not alter significantly due to different crop sequence treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1415 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Planting autumn sugarcane as a relay intercrop with skipped-row rice in late September or up to mid October, with potato after rice, is recommended for higher cane and sugar yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee7
Treatment
planting autumn sugarcane as a relay intercrop with skipped row planted rice in Late September or up to Mid Octobere7
Outcome
reaping higher yield of cane and sugare7

Verbatim

e7

“planting autumn sugarcane as a relay intercrop with skipped row planted rice in Late September or up to Mid October taking potato as intercrop after harvest of rice can suitably be initiated for reaping higher yield of cane and sugar as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1748 · show in text ↑

Solanum tuberosum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Oryza sativa · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Solanum tuberosum · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

intercropping · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

rotation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.