Paper · 1982

Residual effect of glyphosate as a ripener on sugarcane.

R. A. Donaldson; N. G. Inman Bamber

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of a low dosage of glyphosate in raising the juice purity and sucrose content of unstressed sugarcane 'stalks is well documented. The residual effect of the ripener on the succeeding crop of cane grown under favourable conditions has been shown to be short-lived, seldom influencing yields. The low residual activity of glyphosate was confirmed in several trials grown under optimum moisture conditions. In one large trial in which three successive crops were sprayed no evidence of a residual effect on yield was found. Yields were, however, increased considerably by the ripening effect of glyphosate. In three rainfed trials affected by drought, yields were reduced by 11 to 17% due to the application of glyphosate on the preceding crop. The decrease in yield in some varieties was much greater than in others. Varietal differences could be attributed to the different sensitivities of varieties to drought rather than to glyphosate per se. It is recommended that glyphosate be used only where cane is not stressed or likely to be stressed between the time of spraying and harvesting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one large trial with three successive sprayed crops, no residual effect of glyphosate on yield was found.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
three successive crops were sprayede1
Outcome
residual effect on yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Residual effect of glyphosate as a ripener on sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“In one large trial in which three successive crops were sprayed no evidence of a residual effect on yield was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual activity of glyphosate was low in several trials under optimum moisture conditions.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
glyphosatee2
Outcome
residual activitye2
Direction
lowe2
Setting
optimum moisture conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Residual effect of glyphosate as a ripener on sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“The low residual activity of glyphosate was confirmed in several trials grown under optimum moisture conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate increased sugarcane yields considerably through its ripening effect.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
glyphosatee3
Outcome
Yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
considerablye3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Residual effect of glyphosate as a ripener on sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yields were, however, increased considerably by the ripening effect of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate applied to the preceding crop reduced sugarcane yields by 11 to 17% in rainfed trials affected by drought.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of glyphosate on the preceding crope4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
reducede4
Value
11 to 17%e4
Qualifier
affected by droughte4
Setting
rainfed trialse4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Residual effect of glyphosate as a ripener on sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e4

“In three rainfed trials affected by drought, yields were reduced by 11 to 17% due to the application of glyphosate on the preceding crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–751 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in sugarcane yield was much greater in some varieties than in others.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
some varietiese5
Outcome
decrease in yielde5
Direction
much greatere5
Comparator
otherse5

Verbatim

t0

“Residual effect of glyphosate as a ripener on sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e5

“The decrease in yield in some varieties was much greater than in others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–824 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate should be used only where cane is not stressed or likely to be stressed between spraying and harvesting.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
glyphosate be used only where cane is not stressede6
Qualifier
between the time of spraying and harvestinge6

Verbatim

t0

“Residual effect of glyphosate as a ripener on sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“It is recommended that glyphosate be used only where cane is not stressed or likely to be stressed between the time of spraying and harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1098 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

rotation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.