Paper · 2009 · Weed Technology

Efficacy and Economics of Summer Fallow Conventional and Reduced-Tillage Programs for Sugarcane

Luke M. Etheredge; James L. Griffin; Michael E. Salassi

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During the summer fallow period of the sugarcane production cycle, glyphosate in conjunction with frequent tillage is used to destroy sugarcane regrowth and reduce perennial weed infestations. For tillage to be reduced or eliminated in fallowed fields, weed control must be maintained and sugarcane must be completely destroyed so as not to interfere with the subsequent planting operation. Field studies were conducted to evaluate glyphosate rates and formulations for control of sugarcane, bermudagrass, and johnsongrass. Glyphosate (isopropylamine salt) applied in April at 1.68, 2.24, and 2.80 kg ai/ha controlled 15-cm sugarcane at least 95% 42 d after treatment (DAT). Control of 25- and 40-cm sugarcane was maximized at 1.68 kg/ha (91 and 86% control, respectively). In another study, 25-cm sugarcane was controlled equally with isopropyl amine and potassium salt glyphosate formulations. Bermudagrass control 40 d after glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg/ha was 86% and increased to 98% when the same rate was applied sequentially. In fallowed sugarcane fields, conventional-tillage, reduced-tillage, and no-tillage programs were implemented from mid-April through mid-August to evaluate weed control and economics. When a glyphosate application was substituted for a tillage operation, bermudagrass and johnsongrass control was increased compared with the conventional tillage alone program, but differences in sugarcane and sugar yield among the various programs the following year were not observed. Based on 2006 costs, elimination of a single tillage operation reduced cost $18.49/ha and addition of glyphosate (2.8 kg/ha plus application cost) increased cost $43.47/ha. Total cost for the conventional tillage–alone fallow program was $110.94/ha; where herbicide was used in the reduced-tillage and no-tillage programs, total cost was $19.47 to $77.38/ha more.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

April glyphosate at three stated rates controlled 15 cm sugarcane at least 95% after 42 days.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Glyphosate (isopropylamine salt) applied in April at 1.68, 2.24, and 2.80 kg ai/hae0
Outcome
15-cm sugarcanee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
at least 95%e0
Qualifier
42 d after treatment (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate (isopropylamine salt) applied in April at 1.68, 2.24, and 2.80 kg ai/ha controlled 15-cm sugarcane at least 95% 42 d after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 1.68 kg/ha maximized control of 25 cm sugarcane at 91%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
1.68 kg/hae0
Outcome
25-e0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
91e0
Qualifier
controle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Control of 25- and 40-cm sugarcane was maximized at 1.68 kg/ha (91 and 86% control, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 1.68 kg/ha maximized control of 40 cm sugarcane at 86%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
1.68 kg/hae0
Outcome
40-cm sugarcanee0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Control of 25- and 40-cm sugarcane was maximized at 1.68 kg/ha (91 and 86% control, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two glyphosate salt formulations controlled 25 cm sugarcane equally.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
isopropyl aminee0
Outcome
25-cm sugarcanee0
Direction
equallye0
Comparator
potassium salt glyphosate formulationse0

Verbatim

e0

“25-cm sugarcane was controlled equally with isopropyl amine and potassium salt glyphosate formulations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single glyphosate application controlled bermudagrass by 86% after 40 days.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg/hae0
Interactor
BermudagrassCynodon dactylone0weed
Outcome
Bermudagrass controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · InteractorRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bermudagrass control 40 d after glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg/ha was 86% and increased to 98% when the same rate was applied sequentially.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate increased bermudagrass control to 98%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
the same rate was applied sequentiallye0
Interactor
BermudagrassCynodon dactylone0weed
Outcome
Bermudagrass controle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
98%e0
Comparator
glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · InteractorRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bermudagrass control 40 d after glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg/ha was 86% and increased to 98% when the same rate was applied sequentially.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing tillage with glyphosate increased bermudagrass control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
a glyphosate application was substituted for a tillage operatione0
Interactor
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone0weed
Outcome
bermudagrasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the conventional tillage alone programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · InteractorRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When a glyphosate application was substituted for a tillage operation, bermudagrass and johnsongrass control was increased compared with the conventional tillage alone program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing tillage with glyphosate increased johnsongrass control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
a glyphosate application was substituted for a tillage operatione0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee0weed
Outcome
johnsongrass controle0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the conventional tillage alone programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When a glyphosate application was substituted for a tillage operation, bermudagrass and johnsongrass control was increased compared with the conventional tillage alone program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow programs did not differ in next-year sugarcane and sugar yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
various programse0
Outcome
sugarcane and sugar yielde0
Direction
not observede0
Qualifier
the following yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“differences in sugarcane and sugar yield among the various programs the following year were not observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing one tillage operation reduced cost by $18.49/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
elimination of a single tillage operatione0
Outcome
coste0
Direction
reducede0
Value
$18.49/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“elimination of a single tillage operation reduced cost $18.49/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding glyphosate increased cost by $43.47/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
addition of glyphosate (2.8 kg/ha plus application cost)e0
Outcome
coste0
Direction
increasede0
Value
$43.47/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“addition of glyphosate (2.8 kg/ha plus application cost) increased cost $43.47/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The conventional tillage alone fallow program cost $110.94/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
conventional tillage–alone fallow programe0
Outcome
Total coste0
Value
$110.94/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Total cost for the conventional tillage–alone fallow program was $110.94/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide based reduced and no tillage programs cost $19.47 to $77.38/ha more.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
herbicide was used in the reduced-tillage and no-tillage programse0
Outcome
total coste0
Direction
moree0
Value
$19.47 to $77.38/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“where herbicide was used in the reduced-tillage and no-tillage programs, total cost was $19.47 to $77.38/ha more.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

glyphosate · Sorghum halepense · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glyphosate · Cynodon dactylon · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

tillage · Cynodon dactylon · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 35 positive, 13 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.