Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glyphosate plus hoeing gave higher cane yield than three manual hoeings.

A claim from Effect of fertility levels and weed-management practices on yield potential, nutri- ent uptake and economics of spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus hoeing gave higher cane yield than three manual hoeings.

Taxon
sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
glyphosate @ 1.0 kg a.i. at 25 days after plant- ing + one hoeing at 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
3 manual hoeing at 30, 60 and 90 days after plantinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cane yield, millable canes and nutrient removal were witnessed higher under glyphosate @ 1.0 kg a.i. at 25 days after plant- ing + one hoeing at 60 days after planting, followed by 3 manual hoeing at 30, 60 and 90 days after planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2010–2248
t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–160

Title

Effect of fertility levels and weed-management practices on yield potential, nutri- ent uptake and economics of spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)

VACHIN KUMAR; SANDEEP KUMAR; SANJAY KUMAR; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v59i1.4529

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-fa9d0efd6c3afb3a23d043d7b6f44cc71ddb352571cc8ec3c498b817a26825ac · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.