Paper · 2011 · International sugar journal

Late-season glyphosate ripener application coupler with post-harvest residue retention impacts subsequent ratoon yields

Ryan P. Viator; Caleb D. Dailey; Edward P. Richard

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Different sources of plant stress, when present together, can have compounded effects on cane growth and yield. The objectives of this experiment were to determine: 1) if late-season (Nov. 1) glyphosate ripener application increases sucrose yield in the four common commercial sugarcane cultivars grown in Louisiana, USA 2) cultivar differences in susceptibility to injury from residual glyphosate in successive ratoon crops, and 3) if the stress of residual glyphosate on the subsequent ratoon crop is compounded by the presence of post-harvest residue. Glyphosate was applied on Nov. 1 (0.21 kg ai ha -1 ) to the first-ratoon crop. Two weeks after the first ratoon was harvested, the blanket of crop residue was either allowed to remain or completely removed by burning. Regardless of variety, late-season ripener application offered no increase in sucrose yield in first ratoon, and residual effects of glyphosate in the subsequent second-ratoon crop yield were not variety specific. Residual effect of glyphosate when post-harvest residue was not removed reduced sucrose yields by 13% relative to the non-treated control. Sucrose yield in the second-ratoon crop was not reduced when glyphosate was applied and residue was removed. When treated with glyphosate the previous year, residue retention reduced stalk population and photosynthesis in the second-ratoon crop compared to when residue was removed. Late-season glyphosate ripener applications are not recommended due to a lack of response by sugarcane coupled with the potential of residual injury effects caused by translocation of glyphosate into the crown, especially if post-harvest residue cannot be removed prior to the emergence of the subsequent ratoon crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season glyphosate ripener application did not increase sucrose yield in the first ratoon of sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
first ratoone1
Treatment
late-season ripener applicatione1
Outcome
sucrose yielde1
Direction
no increasee1
Setting
Louisiana, USAe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“if late-season (Nov. 1) glyphosate ripener application increases sucrose yield in the four common commercial sugarcane cultivars grown in Louisiana, USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–320 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regardless of variety, late-season ripener application offered no increase in sucrose yield in first ratoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual glyphosate with post-harvest residue left in place reduced sucrose yield by 13% relative to the non-treated control.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Residual effect of glyphosate when post-harvest residue was not removede2
Outcome
sucrose yieldse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
13%e2
Comparator
non-treated controle2
Setting
Louisiana, USAe0

Verbatim

e0

“if late-season (Nov. 1) glyphosate ripener application increases sucrose yield in the four common commercial sugarcane cultivars grown in Louisiana, USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–320 · show in text ↑
e2

“Residual effect of glyphosate when post-harvest residue was not removed reduced sucrose yields by 13% relative to the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose yield in the second-ratoon crop was not reduced when glyphosate was applied and post-harvest residue was removed.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
second-ratoon crope3
Treatment
glyphosate was applied and residue was removede3
Outcome
Sucrose yielde3
Direction
not reducede3
Setting
Louisiana, USAe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“if late-season (Nov. 1) glyphosate ripener application increases sucrose yield in the four common commercial sugarcane cultivars grown in Louisiana, USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–320 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sucrose yield in the second-ratoon crop was not reduced when glyphosate was applied and residue was removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual effects of glyphosate on second-ratoon yield were not variety specific.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
second-ratoon crope4
Outcome
residual effects of glyphosate in the subsequent second-ratoon crop yielde4
Qualifier
not variety specifice4

Verbatim

e0

“if late-season (Nov. 1) glyphosate ripener application increases sucrose yield in the four common commercial sugarcane cultivars grown in Louisiana, USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–320 · show in text ↑
e4

“residual effects of glyphosate in the subsequent second-ratoon crop yield were not variety specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue retention after glyphosate treatment reduced stalk population and photosynthesis in the second-ratoon crop compared with residue removal.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
second-ratoon crope5
Treatment
When treated with glyphosate the previous year, residue retentione5
Outcome
stalk population and photosynthesise5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
residue was removede5

Verbatim

e0

“if late-season (Nov. 1) glyphosate ripener application increases sucrose yield in the four common commercial sugarcane cultivars grown in Louisiana, USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–320 · show in text ↑
e5

“When treated with glyphosate the previous year, residue retention reduced stalk population and photosynthesis in the second-ratoon crop compared to when residue was removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1407 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season glyphosate ripener applications are not recommended for sugarcane because of no yield response and the risk of residual injury.

Taxon
sugarcanee6
Outcome
Late-season glyphosate ripener applicationse6
Qualifier
residual injury effects caused by translocation of glyphosate into the crowne6

Verbatim

e6

“Late-season glyphosate ripener applications are not recommended due to a lack of response by sugarcane coupled with the potential of residual injury effects caused by translocation of glyphosate into the crown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1618 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

glyphosate · physiology: photosynthesis · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glyphosate · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.