Paper · 2012 · Journal of research

Competitive ability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by different weed control treatments for the control of Phalaris minor

Ramanjit Kaur; R. K. Mahey

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2006–07 and 2007–08 to study the effect of weed control methods for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat and to find out the critical population level of Phalaris minor. The presence of Phalaris minor caused considerable reduction in dry matter production, effective number of tillers, chlorophyll index and ultimately yield of wheat crop. Reduction in wheat yield was mainly attributed to reduction in the number of effective tillers, lesser number of grains per spike and lesser 1000-grain weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phalaris minor reduced wheat dry matter production, effective tiller number and chlorophyll index.

Treatment
presence of Phalaris minore0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry matter production, effective number of tillers, chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of Phalaris minor caused considerable reduction in dry matter production, effective number of tillers, chlorophyll index and ultimately yield of wheat crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phalaris minor reduced wheat yield.

Treatment
presence of Phalaris minore0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
yield of wheat crope0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of Phalaris minor caused considerable reduction in dry matter production, effective number of tillers, chlorophyll index and ultimately yield of wheat crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–381 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced wheat yield was attributed mainly to fewer effective tillers, grains per spike and lower thousand grain weight.

Outcome
wheat yielde0
Qualifier
reduction in the number of effective tillers, lesser number of grains per spike and lesser 1000-grain weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in wheat yield was mainly attributed to reduction in the number of effective tillers, lesser number of grains per spike and lesser 1000-grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–541 · show in text ↑

Phalaris minor · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.