Abstract
Background: A study was done during the Rabi 2022-23 on the farm of Lovely Professional University, Phagwara (Punjab) on “Effect of planting patterns, weed competition on growth, yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).” PBW-824 variety was used for the experiment which is suitable under irrigated conditions of Punjab. Methods: The experiment was conducted in split plot design (SPD) with 4 planting techniques viz. two rows per bed, three rows/bed, bidirectional sowing, flat/line sowing in main/major plots and four weed competition treatments viz. competition by Phalaris minor only, competition by broad leaf weeds only, competition by both (weedy check) and no competition (weed free) in minor/sub plots. Result: The findings concluded that among main plots, crucially more grain yield (51.93 q/ha) and (51.29 q/ha) was obtained in cross sowing and three rows/bed, than two rows/bed and flat/line sowing pattern. Also increased seed/kernel yield in cross sowing, three rows/bed and two rows/bed was (14.43%, 13.02% and 5.39%) respectively than flat sowing. The growth and yield attributes were also seriously more in cross sowing, three rows per bed than flat sowing. Among weed competition treatments grain yield was significantly higher in no competition by both Phalaris minor and broad leaf weeds than other weed competition treatments. There were 41.85%, 25.55% and 14.75% increased grain yield in no competition treatment, competition by broad leaf weeds only and competition by Phalaris minor only as compared to control (unweeded) treatment. Among sub plots, all yield attributes were significantly higher in weed free treatment as contrast to all other weed competition treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
cross sowing gave more wheat grain yield than two rows/bed and flat/line sowing.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- cross sowinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 51.93 q/hae0
- Comparator
- two rows/bed and flat/line sowing patterne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The findings concluded that among main plots, crucially more grain yield (51.93 q/ha) and (51.29 q/ha) was obtained in cross sowing and three rows/bed, than two rows/bed and flat/line sowing pattern.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
three rows/bed gave more wheat grain yield than two rows/bed and flat/line sowing.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- three rows/bede0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 51.29 q/hae0
- Comparator
- two rows/bed and flat/line sowing patterne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The findings concluded that among main plots, crucially more grain yield (51.93 q/ha) and (51.29 q/ha) was obtained in cross sowing and three rows/bed, than two rows/bed and flat/line sowing pattern.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
cross sowing increased wheat seed/kernel yield by 14.43% versus flat sowing.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- cross sowinge0
- Outcome
- seed/kernel yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 14.43%e0
- Comparator
- flat sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Also increased seed/kernel yield in cross sowing, three rows/bed and two rows/bed was (14.43%, 13.02% and 5.39%) respectively than flat sowing.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
three rows/bed increased wheat seed/kernel yield by 13.02% versus flat sowing.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- three rows/bede0
- Outcome
- seed/kernel yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 13.02%e0
- Comparator
- flat sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Also increased seed/kernel yield in cross sowing, three rows/bed and two rows/bed was (14.43%, 13.02% and 5.39%) respectively than flat sowing.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
two rows/bed increased wheat seed/kernel yield by 5.39% versus flat sowing.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- two rows/bede0
- Outcome
- seed/kernel yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 5.39%e0
- Comparator
- flat sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Also increased seed/kernel yield in cross sowing, three rows/bed and two rows/bed was (14.43%, 13.02% and 5.39%) respectively than flat sowing.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
cross sowing produced greater wheat growth and yield attributes than flat sowing.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- cross sowinge0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- flat sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth and yield attributes were also seriously more in cross sowing, three rows per bed than flat sowing.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
three rows per bed produced greater wheat growth and yield attributes than flat sowing.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- three rows per bede0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- flat sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth and yield attributes were also seriously more in cross sowing, three rows per bed than flat sowing.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield was significantly higher without weed competition than with other weed competition treatments.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- no competition by both Phalaris minor and broad leaf weedse0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minor
.jpg?width=60)
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other weed competition treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Among weed competition treatments grain yield was significantly higher in no competition by both Phalaris minor and broad leaf weeds than other weed competition treatments.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
no competition treatment increased wheat grain yield by 41.85% versus the unweeded control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- no competition treatmente0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 41.85%e0
- Comparator
- control (unweeded) treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were 41.85%, 25.55% and 14.75% increased grain yield in no competition treatment, competition by broad leaf weeds only and competition by Phalaris minor only as compared to control (unweeded) treatment.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
competition by broad leaf weeds only increased wheat grain yield by 25.55% versus the unweeded control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- competition by broad leaf weeds onlye0
- Interactor
- broad leaf weedse0weed
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 25.55%e0
- Comparator
- control (unweeded) treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were 41.85%, 25.55% and 14.75% increased grain yield in no competition treatment, competition by broad leaf weeds only and competition by Phalaris minor only as compared to control (unweeded) treatment.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
competition by Phalaris minor only increased wheat grain yield by 14.75% versus the unweeded control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- competition by Phalaris minor onlye0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 14.75%e0
- Comparator
- control (unweeded) treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were 41.85%, 25.55% and 14.75% increased grain yield in no competition treatment, competition by broad leaf weeds only and competition by Phalaris minor only as compared to control (unweeded) treatment.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield attributes were significantly higher in weed-free plots than in other weed competition treatments.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- weed free treatmente0
- Outcome
- all yield attributese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- all other weed competition treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among sub plots, all yield attributes were significantly higher in weed free treatment as contrast to all other weed competition treatments.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Phalaris minor · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →competition · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →competition · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
559 papers more in this group
See all 563 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.