Paper · 2008 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Performance and stability of performance of spring wheat variety mixtures in organic and conventional management systems in western Canada

A. H. E. E. KAUT; H. E. MASON; A. NAVABI; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) variety mixtures represent a relatively unexplored avenue for maintaining and stabilizing yield for both organic and conventional producers. The present study examined the responses of three Canadian western red spring wheat varieties in sole crop and in variety mixtures to varying levels of simulated and natural competition, as well as environmental stress at one conventionally and two organically managed locations in central Alberta, Canada, between 2003 and 2005. Three modern hard red spring wheat varieties (Superb, semi-dwarf; AC Intrepid, early maturing and 5600HR, tall), along with 13 two- and three-way variety mixtures, were planted under two levels of simulated weed ( Brassica juncea L.) competition at each of the eight location-years. The B. juncea weed competition treatment decreased yields at all locations. Overall yield was lowest at the certified organic farm and highest under conventional management. Sole-crop semi-dwarf Superb and all three Superb–Intrepid mixture entries consistently yielded among the highest, regardless of management system, testing location or competition treatment. The 1:1 and 1:2 Superb–Intrepid mixture entries were the most stable of all entries tested. Early season vigour was strongly associated with yield, with the strongest correlation occurring under low-moisture, low-nutrient, high-competition conditions at the certified organic farm. Spring wheat variety mixtures may provide greater stability with little or no reduction in yield, while providing greater competitive ability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. juncea competition decreased wheat yield at all locations.

Treatment
B. juncea weed competition treatmente0
Interactor
B. junceaBrassica junceae0weed
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B. juncea weed competition treatment decreased yields at all locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was lowest at the certified organic farm.

Outcome
Overall yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
certified organic farme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall yield was lowest at the certified organic farm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–922 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was highest under conventional management.

Outcome
Overall yielde1
Direction
higheste0
Setting
conventional managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest under conventional management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall yield was lowest at the certified organic farm and highest under conventional management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–964 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-crop Superb was consistently among the highest yielding entries.

Material
Superbe0
Outcome
yielded among the higheste0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
regardless of management system, testing location or competition treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole-crop semi-dwarf Superb and all three Superb–Intrepid mixture entries consistently yielded among the highest, regardless of management system, testing location or competition treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three Superb–Intrepid mixtures consistently yielded among the highest.

Material
Superb–Intrepid mixture entriese0
Outcome
yielded among the higheste0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all three Superb–Intrepid mixture entries consistently yielded among the highest, regardless of management system, testing location or competition treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 Superb–Intrepid mixture was among the most stable entries.

Material
1:1e0
Outcome
stablee0
Direction
moste0
Comparator
all entries testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1:1 and 1:2 Superb–Intrepid mixture entries were the most stable of all entries tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:2 Superb–Intrepid mixture was among the most stable entries.

Material
1:2 Superb–Intrepid mixture entriese0
Outcome
stablee0
Direction
moste0
Comparator
all entries testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1:1 and 1:2 Superb–Intrepid mixture entries were the most stable of all entries tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early season vigour was strongly associated with wheat yield, especially at the dry, nutrient-poor, high-competition organic farm.

Organ / stage
Early seasone0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
low-moisture, low-nutrient, high-competition conditionse0
Setting
certified organic farme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early season vigour was strongly associated with yield, with the strongest correlation occurring under low-moisture, low-nutrient, high-competition conditions at the certified organic farm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest wheat variety mixtures may increase stability with little yield loss and greater competitiveness.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
Spring wheat variety mixtures may provide greater stability with little or no reduction in yield, while providing greater competitive abilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring wheat variety mixtures may provide greater stability with little or no reduction in yield, while providing greater competitive ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1579 · show in text ↑

Brassica juncea · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

competition · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 3 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.