Paper · 2014 · Weed Technology

Control of Rigid Ryegrass in Australian Wheat Production with Pyroxasulfone

Peter Boutsalis; Gurjeet S. Gill; Christopher Preston

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In Australia, most wheat is sown in a no-till system without prior cultivation where herbicides are applied prior to sowing and incorporated by the planter. Trifluralin has been the most widely used PRE herbicide to control rigid ryegrass. The objective of this research was to determine crop safety and efficacy of alternative mechanism of action PRE herbicides for rigid ryegrass control in no-till wheat production. Pyroxasulfone achieved 98% control with PRE applications. The alternative PRE herbicides tested alone and in mixtures occasionally resulted in a significant reduction in wheat emergence but not crop yield. Trifluralin treatments failed at sites having trifluralin-resistant rigid ryegrass. Pyroxasulfone and prosulfocarb plus S -metolachlor were effective for control of rigid ryegrass across all trials with control ranging from 64 to 94%. This research demonstrated that PRE applications of herbicides other than trifluralin such as pyroxasulfone and prosulfocarb plus S -metolachlor can be safely and effectively used to control rigid ryegrass in no-till wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE pyroxasulfone controlled rigid ryegrass by 98%.

Treatment
Pyroxasulfonee0
Interactor
Rigid Ryegrasst0weed
Outcome
controle0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone achieved 98% control with PRE applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rigid Ryegrass in Australian Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative PRE herbicides occasionally significantly reduced wheat emergence.

Treatment
alternative PRE herbicidese0
Outcome
wheat emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
occasionallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alternative PRE herbicides tested alone and in mixtures occasionally resulted in a significant reduction in wheat emergence but not crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative PRE herbicides did not reduce crop yield.

Treatment
alternative PRE herbicidese0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alternative PRE herbicides tested alone and in mixtures occasionally resulted in a significant reduction in wheat emergence but not crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin failed where rigid ryegrass was resistant.

Treatment
Trifluralin treatmentse0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasse0weed
Outcome
rigid ryegrasse0
Direction
failede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin treatments failed at sites having trifluralin-resistant rigid ryegrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone controlled rigid ryegrass across trials at 64 to 94%.

Treatment
Pyroxasulfonee0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasse0weed
Outcome
control of rigid ryegrasse0
Value
64 to 94%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone and prosulfocarb plus S -metolachlor were effective for control of rigid ryegrass across all trials with control ranging from 64 to 94%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prosulfocarb plus S -metolachlor controlled rigid ryegrass across trials at 64 to 94%.

Treatment
prosulfocarb plus S -metolachlore0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasse0weed
Outcome
control of rigid ryegrasse0
Value
64 to 94%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone and prosulfocarb plus S -metolachlor were effective for control of rigid ryegrass across all trials with control ranging from 64 to 94%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑

prosulfocarb · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

metolachlor · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pyroxasulfone · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 64 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 466 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.