Abstract
Monocrotophos 40 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha with highvolume sprayer gave significantly superior control of safflower aphid over ultra low volume sprayer and other insecticides. The next best treatment was dimethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/ha using high and ultra low volume sprayer and both were at par. There was no significant difference between ultra low volume and high volume sprayers in controlling safflower caterpillar and capsule borer. However, insecticides differed in their efficacy where in dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha gave better control of safflower caterpillar (87.0%) and capsule borer (84,3%). There was a significant difference between sprayers in controlling borer complex. Dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha with high volume sprayer recorded lowest incidence of borer complex (16.8%) and was at par with dlmethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/hawith ultra low volume sprayer (17.5%). Irrespective of sprayers, dlmethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/ha recorded highest seed yield (2265.5 kg/ha) followed by monocrotophos 40 EC.@ 0.5 lit/ha (2120.5. kg/ha) and meatyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha (2056.7kglha). Dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha with ultra low volume sprayer recorded highestbenefit-cost ratio (32.7) followed by methyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha with ultra low volume sprayer (28.4) and dimethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/ha with high volume sprayer (23.9).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
High-volume monocrotophos gave significantly superior aphid control.
- Taxon
- safflower
Carthamus tinctoriust0 - Treatment
- Monocrotophos 40 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha with highvolume sprayere0
- Interactor
- safflower aphide0pest
- Outcome
- control of safflower aphide0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- ultra low volume sprayer and other insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Monocrotophos 40 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha with highvolume sprayer gave significantly superior control of safflower aphid over ultra low volume sprayer and other insecticides.”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate was the next best aphid-control treatment, with high and ultra-low volume sprayers at par.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- dimethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- next best treatmente0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- high and ultra low volume sprayere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The next best treatment was dimethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/ha using high and ultra low volume sprayer and both were at par.”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprayer volumes did not significantly differ for caterpillar and capsule-borer control.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- ultra low volumee0
- Interactor
- safflower caterpillare0pest
- Second interactor
- capsule borere0pest
- Outcome
- controlling safflower caterpillar and capsule borere0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- high volume sprayerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant difference between ultra low volume and high volume sprayers in controlling safflower caterpillar and capsule borer.”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate gave 87.0% caterpillar control.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/hae0
- Interactor
- safflower caterpillare0pest
- Outcome
- control of safflower caterpillare0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 87.0%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha gave better control of safflower caterpillar (87.0%)”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate gave 84,3% capsule-borer control.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- capsule borere0pest
- Outcome
- capsule borere0
- Direction
- bettere1
- Value
- 84,3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“capsule borer (84,3%).”
t0“safflower”
e1“dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha gave better control of safflower caterpillar (87.0%) and capsule borer (84,3%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprayers significantly differed in borer-complex control.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- sprayerse0
- Outcome
- controlling borer complexe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was a significant difference between sprayers in controlling borer complex.”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
High-volume dimethoate gave 16.8% borer incidence, at par with ultra-low-volume dimethoate at 17.5%.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- Dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha with high volume sprayere0
- Outcome
- incidence of borer complexe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 16.8%e0
- Qualifier
- 17.5%e0
- Comparator
- dlmethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/hawith ultra low volume sprayere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha with high volume sprayer recorded lowest incidence of borer complex (16.8%) and was at par with dlmethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/hawith ultra low volume sprayer (17.5%).”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate gave the highest seed yield of 2265.5 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- dlmethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2265.5 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dlmethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/ha recorded highest seed yield (2265.5 kg/ha)”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Monocrotophos gave seed yield of 2120.5 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- monocrotophos 40 EC.@ 0.5 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Value
- 2120.5. kg/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“monocrotophos 40 EC.@ 0.5 lit/ha (2120.5. kg/ha)”
t0“safflower”
e1“recorded highest seed yield (2265.5 kg/ha) followed by monocrotophos 40 EC.@ 0.5 lit/ha (2120.5. kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Methyl parathion gave seed yield of 2056.7kglha.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- meatyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Value
- 2056.7kglhae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“meatyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha (2056.7kglha)”
t0“safflower”
e1“recorded highest seed yield (2265.5 kg/ha) followed by monocrotophos 40 EC.@ 0.5 lit/ha (2120.5. kg/ha) and meatyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha (2056.7kglha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ultra-low-volume dimethoate gave the highest benefit-cost ratio, 32.7.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- Dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha with ultra low volume sprayere0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 32.7e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dimethoate 30 EC @ 0.85 lit/ha with ultra low volume sprayer recorded highestbenefit-cost ratio (32.7)”
t0“safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Ultra-low-volume methyl parathion gave benefit-cost ratio 28.4.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- methyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha with ultra low volume sprayere0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe1
- Value
- 28.4e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“methyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha with ultra low volume sprayer (28.4)”
t0“safflower”
e1“recorded highestbenefit-cost ratio (32.7) followed by methyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha with ultra low volume sprayer (28.4)”
Claim · model-written summary
High-volume dimethoate gave benefit-cost ratio 23.9.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- dimethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/ha with high volume sprayere0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe1
- Value
- 23.9e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dimethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/ha with high volume sprayer (23.9)”
t0“safflower”
e1“recorded highestbenefit-cost ratio (32.7) followed by methyl parathion 50 EC @ 0.5 lit/ha with ultra low volume sprayer (28.4) and dimethoate 30 EC@ 0.85 lit/ha with high volume sprayer (23.9)”
The same questions in other papers
dimethoate · control · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
dimethoate · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →application · control · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · disease · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.