Paper · 2018 · Pesticide Research Journal

Evaluation of Suggestive Modules for Management of Safflower Aphid (Dactynotus carthemi HRL) (Homoptera: Aphididae)

D Banerjee; N Chaudhuri; SK Senapati

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Results of field studies on evaluation of suggestive modules for management of safflower aphid (Dactynotus carthemi HRL) (Homoptera: Aphididae), carried out during Rabi 2013–15 in terai region of West Bengal, are reported. Dimethoate 30 per cent EC, imidacloprid 70 per cent WG, lamda cyhalothrin 5 per cent EC, triazophos 40 per cent EC, acephate 75 per cent SP, diafenthiuron 50 per cent WP and neem (1500ppm) were applied in field evaluations at their recommended doses at 15 d interval on 84 d old crop. The major insect-pest of safflower, the aphid and its predator populations were monitored at 1 d before and subsequently at 3, 7, and 14 d after spray. Two consecutive sprays of dimethoate (30% EC) provided highest control of safflower aphid (95.78%) and gave higher yield (12.42 q ha-1). The application of chemical insecticides followed by neem @1500 ppm (module 2) resulted in 81.65–88.63 per cent reduction of aphid population and the yield ranged 10.62–12.34 q ha-1. The spraying of neem @1500 ppm followed by chemical insecticides (module 3) provided 67.91–70.02 per cent control of aphid population and yielded 10.20–11.35 q ha-1. The effect of different treatments of module 2 on predator population reduction was higher. These study suggests the prospect of application of botanical following chemical insecticides to obtain better yield with least disturbance to eco-system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two dimethoate sprays gave 95.78% safflower aphid control.

Treatment
Two consecutive sprays of dimethoate (30% EC)e0
Interactor
safflower aphide0pest
Outcome
control of safflower aphide0
Direction
higheste0
Value
95.78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two consecutive sprays of dimethoate (30% EC) provided highest control of safflower aphid (95.78%) and gave higher yield (12.42 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two dimethoate sprays gave yield of 12.42 q ha-1.

Treatment
Two consecutive sprays of dimethoate (30% EC)e0
Interactor
safflower aphide0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.42 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two consecutive sprays of dimethoate (30% EC) provided highest control of safflower aphid (95.78%) and gave higher yield (12.42 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals followed by neem reduced aphids by 81.65–88.63 per cent.

Treatment
chemical insecticides followed by neem @1500 ppme0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
81.65–88.63 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of chemical insecticides followed by neem @1500 ppm (module 2) resulted in 81.65–88.63 per cent reduction of aphid population and the yield ranged 10.62–12.34 q ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals followed by neem gave yield of 10.62–12.34 q ha-1.

Treatment
chemical insecticides followed by neem @1500 ppme0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
rangede0
Value
10.62–12.34 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of chemical insecticides followed by neem @1500 ppm (module 2) resulted in 81.65–88.63 per cent reduction of aphid population and the yield ranged 10.62–12.34 q ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem followed by chemicals controlled aphids by 67.91–70.02 per cent.

Treatment
neem @1500 ppm followed by chemical insecticidese0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
control of aphid populatione0
Direction
controle0
Value
67.91–70.02 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of neem @1500 ppm followed by chemical insecticides (module 3) provided 67.91–70.02 per cent control of aphid population and yielded 10.20–11.35 q ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem followed by chemicals yielded 10.20–11.35 q ha-1.

Treatment
neem @1500 ppm followed by chemical insecticidese0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
10.20–11.35 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of neem @1500 ppm followed by chemical insecticides (module 3) provided 67.91–70.02 per cent control of aphid population and yielded 10.20–11.35 q ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Module 2 treatments caused higher predator population reduction.

Treatment
different treatments of module 2e0
Interactor
predatore0other
Outcome
predator population reductione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different treatments of module 2 on predator population reduction was higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑

dimethoate · control · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

dimethoate · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

insecticide · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · pest · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · control · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · pest · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.