Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Disease Sciences

Survey and Surveillance of Safflower Diseases with Special Reference to Wilt in Maharashtra

D. R. Murumkar; M. A. Gud; D. V. Indi; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A roving survey was conducted during rabi 2005–06 at flowering to seed development stage of crop in major safflower growing areas of Maharashtra state to know the prevalence of safflower diseases, pathogens associated with the diseases and performance of safflower cultivars against wilt on farmers fields. A total of 771 farmers' fields from major safflower growing areas of Western Maharashtra, Marathwada and Vidarbha region were surveyed for incidence of various diseases on safflower and 274 wilt affected plant samples were collected. During survey, maximum incidence of wilt complex (11.64 %) was observed followed by leaf spots (6.18%) and minor diseases (2.14%). On subjecting the wilt affected root samples for isolation, the main pathogen isolated was Fusariutn oxysporutn f.sp. carthami (21.23%) followed by Rhizactonia bataticola (19.59%), Sclerotium rolfsii (13.29%), Phytophthora sp. (12.71%) and Verticillium sp. (12.64%). This indicated that Fusarium oxysporutn f.sp. carthami was the major pathogen associated with safflower wilt complex. The overall performance of different safflower cultivars to wilt on farmers' field indicated that least wilt incidence was recorded by the safflower hybrid NAR1-NH-1 (1.63%) followed by Phule Kusuma (2.30%), Bhima (3.20%) and Sharda (3.74%) whereas local cultivars recorded on an average 16.74% wilt incidence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilt complex had the highest disease incidence at 11.64%.

Outcome
incidence of wilt complexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.64 %e0
Setting
Maharashtrat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum incidence of wilt complex (11.64 %) was observed followed by leaf spots (6.18%) and minor diseases (2.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower Diseases with Special Reference to Wilt in Maharashtra”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf spots had 6.18% incidence.

Outcome
leaf spotse0
Value
6.18%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf spots (6.18%) and minor diseases (2.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower Diseases with Special Reference to Wilt in Maharashtra”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minor diseases had 2.14% incidence.

Outcome
minor diseasese0
Value
2.14%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minor diseases (2.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower Diseases with Special Reference to Wilt in Maharashtra”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusariutn oxysporutn f.sp. carthami was the most frequently isolated wilt pathogen at 21.23%.

Taxon
Fusariutn oxysporutn f.sp. carthamie0
Interactor
safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0host
Outcome
main pathogen isolatede0
Direction
maine0
Value
21.23%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the main pathogen isolated was Fusariutn oxysporutn f.sp. carthami (21.23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizactonia bataticola accounted for 19.59% of wilt isolates.

Taxon
Rhizactonia bataticolae0
Outcome
Rhizactonia bataticolae0
Value
19.59%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizactonia bataticola (19.59%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sclerotium rolfsii accounted for 13.29% of wilt isolates.

Taxon
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0
Outcome
Sclerotium rolfsiie0
Value
13.29%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · TaxonEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sclerotium rolfsii (13.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–880 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytophthora sp. accounted for 12.71% of wilt isolates.

Taxon
Phytophthora sp.Phytophthorae0
Outcome
Phytophthora sp.e0
Value
12.71%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytophthora sp. (12.71%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verticillium sp. accounted for 12.64% of wilt isolates.

Taxon
Verticillium sp.Verticilliume0
Outcome
Verticillium sp.e0
Value
12.64%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Verticillium sp. (12.64%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAR1-NH-1 had the least wilt incidence at 1.63%.

Material
NAR1-NH-1e0
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Direction
leaste0
Value
1.63%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“least wilt incidence was recorded by the safflower hybrid NAR1-NH-1 (1.63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phule Kusuma had 2.30% wilt incidence.

Material
Phule Kusumae0
Outcome
Wiltt0
Value
2.30%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phule Kusuma (2.30%), Bhima (3.20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower Diseases with Special Reference to Wilt in Maharashtra”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bhima had 3.20% wilt incidence.

Material
Bhimae0
Outcome
Wiltt0
Value
3.20%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bhima (3.20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower Diseases with Special Reference to Wilt in Maharashtra”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sharda had 3.74% wilt incidence.

Material
Shardae0
Outcome
Wiltt0
Value
3.74%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sharda (3.74%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower Diseases with Special Reference to Wilt in Maharashtra”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local cultivars averaged 16.74% wilt incidence.

Material
local cultivarse0
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Value
16.74%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“local cultivars recorded on an average 16.74% wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–36 · show in text ↑