Paper · 1994 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991

Michael J. Ottman; N. Vigorito

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Durum wheat was grown with deficient, adequate, and excessive rates of ¹⁵N-labeled nitrogen fertilizer in order to document fertilizer nitrogen movement in the soil with differing nitrogen management. Crop water use increased with nitrogen rate due to increased vegetative growth. The amount of excess water applied increased with a decrease in nitrogen rate. Soil bromide concentrations at harvest suggest that the maximum potential depth of leaching was 3 to 6 feet. Most of the fertilizer applied in this study was recovered in the top 2 to 3 feet of soil. Fertilizer nitrogen rate and timing resulted in some differences in recovery of labeled fertilizer in the soil and plant, but did not contribute significantly to the depth of fertilizer nitrogen leaching.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop water use increased with nitrogen rate due to vegetative growth.

Treatment
nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
Crop water usee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop water use increased with nitrogen rate due to increased vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess water applied increased as nitrogen rate decreased.

Treatment
nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
excess water appliede0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of excess water applied increased with a decrease in nitrogen rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bromide suggested a maximum potential leaching depth of 3 to 6 feet.

Outcome
maximum potential depth of leachinge0
Value
3 to 6 feete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil bromide concentrations at harvest suggest that the maximum potential depth of leaching was 3 to 6 feet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most fertilizer was recovered in the top 2 to 3 feet of soil.

Outcome
fertilizer appliede0
Value
2 to 3 feete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the fertilizer applied in this study was recovered in the top 2 to 3 feet of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and timing caused some differences in soil and plant recovery of labeled fertilizer.

Treatment
Fertilizer nitrogen rate and timinge0
Outcome
recovery of labeled fertilizere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer nitrogen rate and timing resulted in some differences in recovery of labeled fertilizer in the soil and plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and timing did not significantly alter fertilizer nitrogen leaching depth.

Treatment
Nitrogen rate and timingt0
Outcome
depth of fertilizer nitrogen leachinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but did not contribute significantly to the depth of fertilizer nitrogen leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 19 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.