Paper · 1992 · Nematologia mediterranea

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ROOT-ROT DISEASE COMPLEX OF CHICKPEA CAUSED BY MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA RACE 3 AND MACROPHOMINA PHASEOLINA

Zaki A. Siddiqui; Irshad Mahmood

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four biocontrol agents viz. Paecilomyces lilacinus, Acrophialophora fusispora, Bacillus licheniformis and Alcaligenes faecalis were used in three doses for the control of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 and Macrophomina phaseolina on chickpea (Cicer arietnum). All with the biocontrol agents except A. faecalis were found more effective in improving plant growth when used against M. incognita alone or with M. phaseolina but less effective against M. phaseolina alone. A faecalis had an adverse effect on plant growth. P. lilacinus was the best biocontrol agent while B. licheniformis and A. fusispora were equally effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paecilomyces lilacinus improved plant growth against M. incognita alone or with M. phaseolina.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biocontrol agentse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All with the biocontrol agents except A. faecalis were found more effective in improving plant growth when used against M. incognita alone or with M. phaseolina but less effective against M. phaseolina alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. faecalis adversely affected chickpea growth.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
A faecalise0
Interactor
A faecalisAlcaligenes faecalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
adversee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alcaligenes faecalis
Alcaligenes faecalis · InteractorCDC/ Dr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A faecalis had an adverse effect on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. lilacinus ranked the best biocontrol agent.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
best biocontrol agente0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. lilacinus was the best biocontrol agent while B. licheniformis and A. fusispora were equally effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. licheniformis and A. fusispora were equally effective.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Interactor
B. licheniformisBacillus licheniformise0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
A. fusisporaAcrophialophora fusisporae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
equally effectivee0
Direction
equallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus licheniformis
Bacillus licheniformis · InteractorStefan Walkowski · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acrophialophora fusispora
Acrophialophora fusispora · Second interactorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. licheniformis and A. fusispora were equally effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–58 · show in text ↑