Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during 1991–92 to 1995–96 to study the effect of intercroopping in ber plantation on yield and monetary return. Irrespective of intercrops tested, ber based intercropping system recorded 7.0 per cent higher ber fruit yield than ber sole system. Similarly, ber based intercropping system recorded 19.6 per cent more ber fruit equivalent yield than ber sale. Among the different systems, ber+green gram gave the highest net monetary return (Rs. 13099/ha) followed by ber+sorghum system (Rs.11,886/ha). Intercropping in ber recorded on an average 10.0 per cent higher monetary returns (Rs. 11329/ha) over ber sole system (Rs.10287/ha) per annum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Ber-based intercropping gave 7.0% higher ber fruit yield than ber sole cropping.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianae2 - Treatment
- ber based intercropping systeme2
- Outcome
- ber fruit yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 7.0 per cente2
- Comparator
- ber sole systeme2
- Setting
- field experimente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was conducted”
e2“ber based intercropping system recorded 7.0 per cent higher ber fruit yield than ber sole system”
Claim · model-written summary
Ber-based intercropping gave 19.6% more ber fruit equivalent yield than ber sole cropping.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianae3
- Treatment
- ber based intercropping systeme3
- Outcome
- ber fruit equivalent yielde3
- Direction
- moree3
- Value
- 19.6 per cente3
- Comparator
- ber salee3
- Setting
- field experimente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was conducted”
e3“ber based intercropping system recorded 19.6 per cent more ber fruit equivalent yield than ber sale”
Claim · model-written summary
Ber with green gram gave the highest net monetary return among the intercropping systems (Rs. 13099/ha).
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianae4
- Treatment
- ber+green grame4
- Outcome
- net monetary returne4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- Rs. 13099/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“ber+green gram gave the highest net monetary return (Rs. 13099/ha) followed by ber+sorghum system (Rs.11,886/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ber with sorghum gave the second-highest net monetary return, after ber with green gram (Rs.11,886/ha).
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianae4
- Treatment
- ber+sorghum systeme4
- Outcome
- net monetary returne4
- Direction
- followed bye4
- Value
- Rs.11,886/hae4
- Comparator
- ber+green grame4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“ber+green gram gave the highest net monetary return (Rs. 13099/ha) followed by ber+sorghum system (Rs.11,886/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping in ber gave on average 10.0% higher monetary returns per annum than ber sole cropping (Rs. 11329/ha against Rs.10287/ha).
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianae5
- Treatment
- Intercropping in bere5
- Outcome
- monetary returnse5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 10.0 per cente5
- Qualifier
- per annume5
- Comparator
- ber sole systeme5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Intercropping in ber recorded on an average 10.0 per cent higher monetary returns (Rs. 11329/ha) over ber sole system (Rs.10287/ha) per annum”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.