Paper · 2012

Effect of sources and levels of sulphur on sulphur uptake, yield and quality of linseed (Linum usitatissimum)

Manoj Kumar Pandey; Javed Ali

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A Field experiment was conducted during rabi seasons of 2008-09 and 2009-10 at Bichpuri (Agra) to assess the effect of sources and levels of sulphur on yield, quality and uptake of sulphur by linseed (Linum usitatissimum). Each successive increase in the level of sulphur upto 40 kg/ ha significantly increased the seed and stover yield. However, 60 kg S /ha proved significantly superior for oil yield and uptake of sulphur by linseed crop. Among sources of sulphur, ammonium sulphate, being at par with gypsum, proved significantly superior to other sources for seed, stover and oil yields and S uptake. Sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiency were the highest when lowest level of S was applied. Among the sources of S, maximum values of sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiency were recorded with ammonium sulphate and least with pyrites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each successive increase in sulphur level up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased linseed seed and stover yield.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
level of sulphur upto 40 kg/ hae1
Outcome
seed and stover yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“Each successive increase in the level of sulphur upto 40 kg/ ha significantly increased the seed and stover yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

60 kg S/ha was significantly superior for linseed oil yield and sulphur uptake.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
60 kg S /hae2
Outcome
oil yield and uptake of sulphure2
Direction
superiore2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 · show in text ↑
e2

“60 kg S /ha proved significantly superior for oil yield and uptake of sulphur by linseed crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate was significantly superior to other sulphur sources for linseed seed, stover and oil yields.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
ammonium sulphatee3
Outcome
seed, stover and oil yieldse3
Direction
superiore3
Comparator
other sourcese3

Verbatim

e0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 · show in text ↑
e3

“ammonium sulphate, being at par with gypsum, proved significantly superior to other sources for seed, stover and oil yields and S uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate was significantly superior to other sulphur sources for linseed S uptake.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
ammonium sulphatee3
Outcome
S uptakee3
Direction
superiore3
Comparator
other sourcese3

Verbatim

e0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 · show in text ↑
e3

“ammonium sulphate, being at par with gypsum, proved significantly superior to other sources for seed, stover and oil yields and S uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate was at par with gypsum.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
ammonium sulphatee3
Outcome
at pare3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
gypsume3

Verbatim

e0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 · show in text ↑
e3

“ammonium sulphate, being at par with gypsum, proved significantly superior to other sources for seed, stover and oil yields and S uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiency were highest at the lowest sulphur level.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
lowest level of Se5
Outcome
Sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiencye5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiency were the highest when lowest level of S was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among sulphur sources, ammonium sulphate gave the maximum sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiency.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
ammonium sulphatee6
Outcome
sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiencye6
Direction
maximume6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 · show in text ↑
e6

“maximum values of sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiency were recorded with ammonium sulphate and least with pyrites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrites gave the least sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiency among sulphur sources.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
pyritese6
Outcome
sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiencye6
Direction
leaste6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“linseed (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 · show in text ↑
e6

“maximum values of sulphur use efficiency and sulphur uptake efficiency were recorded with ammonium sulphate and least with pyrites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–866 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

ammonium sulfate · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.