Paper · 2015 · Journal of Pollination Ecology

The role of artificial pollination and pollen effect on ear development and kernel structure of different maize genotypes

Fatih Kahrıman; Cem Ömer Egesel; Tuncay Aydın; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Pollen effect is important on several kernel traits in maize breeding and may vary under different pollination treatments. Our objectives in this study were i) to evaluate the effects of pollination treatments that are commonly used in maize breeding, on several ear and kernel traits, ii) to investigate if the genotypes so called “specialty corn” do have any different reaction to the pollen effect. A field trial was carried out at Dardanos Research and Application Center of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey, in 2013. The experiment used a split plot design with three replicates. Four parents (three inbreds and one open pollinated landrace) were used as plant material. Three pollination treatments (open pollination, self-pollination and bulk pollination) were applied, and individual pollen effect of each parent on other parents was investigated. For this purpose, several ear and kernel traits (ear weight, kernel weight, kernel number, mean kernel weight) and biochemical features (protein, oil, carbohydrate and carotenoid content) were measured on harvested samples.The results showed that pollination treatment affected the variation on all traits except for oil content (P < 0.05). Self-pollination caused a significant reduction in kernel development. Pollen effect was found significant for most traits and this effect was evident on the related genotypes with open pollinated landrace. Results indicate that pollen effect is an important factor on kernel and ear development in small plot trials, where different types of maize are grown together.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollination treatment affected variation in all measured traits except oil content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pollination treatmente0
Outcome
variation on all traits except for oil contente0
Direction
affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pollination treatment affected the variation on all traits except for oil content (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-pollination significantly reduced kernel development.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Self-pollinatione0
Outcome
kernel developmente0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self-pollination caused a significant reduction in kernel development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen source significantly affected most traits, particularly in crosses involving the open pollinated landrace.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
open pollinated landracee0
Treatment
Pollen effecte0
Outcome
most traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pollen effect was found significant for most traits and this effect was evident on the related genotypes with open pollinated landrace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that pollen effect matters for kernel and ear development when different maize types grow together in small plots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
kernel and ear developmente0
Qualifier
small plot trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pollen effect is an important factor on kernel and ear development in small plot trials, where different types of maize are grown together”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑

pollination · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.