Paper · 2011 · Plant Pathology

Temporal association of potato tuber development with susceptibility to common scab and Streptomyces scabiei ‐induced responses in the potato periderm

B. B. Khatri; R. S. Tegg; P. H. Brown; et al.

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
58
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Using hydroponics and novel non‐destructive pot culture systems which enable inoculation at specific tuber development stages, the dynamics of common scab infection patterns in potato were studied in order to provide more precise identification of tuber physiological factors associated with susceptibility. At the whole‐tuber level, infection percentages were greatest when Streptomyces scabiei inoculation occurred early; at 2 weeks after tuberization (WAT) 68% of tubers became infected, contrasting with late inoculation (8 WAT), when only 4% infection occurred. The first‐formed internodes were most susceptible to infection, whilst later‐forming and slower‐expanding internodes were less susceptible. Detailed tuber physiological examination of internode 2 showed that pathogen‐induced changes, including increased phellem (periderm) thickness, cell layers and phellem suberization (key physiological features believed critical to S. scabiei infection) were promoted through S. scabiei inoculation. Sequential harvesting showed enhanced phellem suberization (28% greater than the control) within 7 days of pathogen exposure, while phellem thickness and layer responses were also initiated early in the infection process (10–14 days after pathogen exposure) and these responses were independent of symptom expression. Differences in cultivar response were observed, with greater phellem suberization observed 10 days after tuberization (DAT) in the common‐scab‐tolerant cv. Russet Burbank than in the susceptible cv. Desiree. Likewise, Russet Burbank had thicker and more numerous cell layers in the phellem (up to eight cell layers) during early tuber growth (20–30 DAT) than Desiree (up to six cell layers).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early S. scabiei inoculation at 2 WAT infected 68% of tubers.

Treatment
Streptomyces scabiei inoculatione0
Interactor
Streptomyces scabieiStreptomyces scabieie0pathogen
Outcome
infection percentagese0
Direction
greateste0
Value
68%e0
Comparator
late inoculation (8 WAT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infection percentages were greatest when Streptomyces scabiei inoculation occurred early; at 2 weeks after tuberization (WAT) 68% of tubers became infected, contrasting with late inoculation (8 WAT), when only 4% infection occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late inoculation at 8 WAT infected only 4% of tubers.

Treatment
late inoculation (8 WAT)e0
Interactor
Streptomyces scabieiStreptomyces scabieie0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
onlye0
Value
4%e0
Comparator
Streptomyces scabiei inoculation occurred earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infection percentages were greatest when Streptomyces scabiei inoculation occurred early; at 2 weeks after tuberization (WAT) 68% of tubers became infected, contrasting with late inoculation (8 WAT), when only 4% infection occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-formed internodes were most susceptible to infection.

Organ / stage
first‐formed internodese0
Interactor
Streptomyces scabieiStreptomyces scabieie2pathogen
Outcome
susceptible to infectione0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first‐formed internodes were most susceptible to infection, whilst later‐forming and slower‐expanding internodes were less susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“Streptomyces scabiei inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later-forming, slower-expanding internodes were less susceptible.

Organ / stage
later‐forming and slower‐expanding internodese0
Interactor
Streptomyces scabieiStreptomyces scabieie2pathogen
Outcome
susceptiblee0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first‐formed internodes were most susceptible to infection, whilst later‐forming and slower‐expanding internodes were less susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“Streptomyces scabiei inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. scabiei inoculation increased phellem (periderm) thickness.

Treatment
S. scabiei inoculatione0
Interactor
S. scabieiStreptomyces scabieie0pathogen
Outcome
phellem (periderm) thicknesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased phellem (periderm) thickness, cell layers and phellem suberization (key physiological features believed critical to S. scabiei infection) were promoted through S. scabiei inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. scabiei inoculation increased cell layers.

Treatment
S. scabiei inoculatione0
Interactor
S. scabieiStreptomyces scabieie0pathogen
Outcome
cell layerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased phellem (periderm) thickness, cell layers and phellem suberization (key physiological features believed critical to S. scabiei infection) were promoted through S. scabiei inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. scabiei inoculation increased phellem suberization.

Treatment
S. scabiei inoculatione0
Interactor
S. scabieiStreptomyces scabieie0pathogen
Outcome
phellem suberizatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased phellem (periderm) thickness, cell layers and phellem suberization (key physiological features believed critical to S. scabiei infection) were promoted through S. scabiei inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phellem suberization was 28% greater than controls within 7 days of pathogen exposure.

Treatment
pathogen exposuree0
Interactor
S. scabieiStreptomyces scabieie2pathogen
Outcome
phellem suberizatione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
28%e0
Qualifier
within 7 dayse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced phellem suberization (28% greater than the control) within 7 days of pathogen exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“through S. scabiei inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1003 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phellem thickness and layer responses began 10–14 days after pathogen exposure, regardless of symptoms.

Interactor
S. scabieiStreptomyces scabieie2pathogen
Outcome
phellem thickness and layer responsese0
Value
10–14 dayse0
Qualifier
independent of symptom expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phellem thickness and layer responses were also initiated early in the infection process (10–14 days after pathogen exposure) and these responses were independent of symptom expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“through S. scabiei inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1003 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russet Burbank had greater early phellem suberization than Desiree.

Material
cv. Russet Burbanke0
Outcome
phellem suberizatione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
10 days after tuberization (DAT)e0
Comparator
cv. Desireee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater phellem suberization observed 10 days after tuberization (DAT) in the common‐scab‐tolerant cv. Russet Burbank than in the susceptible cv. Desiree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1529 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russet Burbank had thicker early phellem cell layers than Desiree.

Material
Russet Burbanke0
Outcome
cell layers in the phelleme0
Direction
thickere0
Qualifier
20–30 DATe0
Comparator
Desireee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Russet Burbank had thicker and more numerous cell layers in the phellem (up to eight cell layers) during early tuber growth (20–30 DAT) than Desiree (up to six cell layers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1713 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russet Burbank had up to eight phellem cell layers versus up to six in Desiree.

Material
Russet Burbanke0
Outcome
cell layers in the phelleme0
Direction
more numerouse0
Value
up to eight cell layerse0
Qualifier
up to six cell layerse0
Comparator
Desireee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Russet Burbank had thicker and more numerous cell layers in the phellem (up to eight cell layers) during early tuber growth (20–30 DAT) than Desiree (up to six cell layers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1713 · show in text ↑
e1

“in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–183 · show in text ↑

Streptomyces scabiei · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · Streptomyces scabiei · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 53 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.