Paper · 2011 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Analysis of relationship among growth, environmental factors and transpiration in soilless culture of paprika plants.

Nguyen Huy Tai; Jong Seok Park; Tae In Ahn; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An accurate moisture control with precise estimation of transpiration of plants is required for low capacity and small size of growing substrate in soilless culture. In this study, a relationship among cumulative transpiration, radiation, vapor pressure deficit, and a relationship between cumulative irrigation and drainage with growth stage were analyzed for development of an optimum irrigation system. Paprika (Capsicum annuum L., cv. Cupura) plants were grown with a plant density of 4.05 plants/m. For obtaining leaf area index (LAI), leaves were sampled every month. The LAI increased from 2.39 to 3.51 for 4 months, reflecting growth stage. Cumulative transpiration was calculated by subtracting the sum of cumulative drainage and an increase in slab weight from cumulative irrigation. Transpiration rate was changed responding proportionally to irradiation. By detailed analysis of transpiration and radiation, cumulative transpiration was regressed well with radiation integral by 2nd-order linear equations in different growth stages, while those with cumulative vapor pressure deficit was regressed by 1st-order linear equations. With increase of LAI, the slopes of cumulative irrigation and drainage curves and the difference between two slopes increased from 0.312 to 0.611, from 0.154 to 0.358, and from 0.158 to 0.253, respectively. In this study, we estimated cumulative transpiration of paprika with several environmental factors according to the plant growth stage and expect this data will contribute to making accurate irrigation strategy based on environmental and growing conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paprika leaf area index increased from 2.39 to 3.51 over four months.

Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.39 to 3.51e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The LAI increased from 2.39 to 3.51 for 4 months, reflecting growth stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–648 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rate changed proportionally with irradiation.

Outcome
Transpiration ratee0

Not reportedTaxonSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Transpiration rate was changed responding proportionally to irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–866 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative transpiration fitted radiation integral with second-order equations across growth stages.

Outcome
cumulative transpiratione0
Qualifier
different growth stagese0
Comparator
radiation integrale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“cumulative transpiration was regressed well with radiation integral by 2nd-order linear equations in different growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1044 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative transpiration fitted cumulative vapor pressure deficit with first-order equations.

Outcome
cumulative vapor pressure deficite0
Comparator
1st-order linear equationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“those with cumulative vapor pressure deficit was regressed by 1st-order linear equations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1141 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As leaf area index increased, cumulative irrigation slope rose from 0.312 to 0.611.

Outcome
slopes of cumulative irrigatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.312 to 0.611e0

Not reportedTaxonOrgan / stage

Verbatim

e0

“With increase of LAI, the slopes of cumulative irrigation and drainage curves and the difference between two slopes increased from 0.312 to 0.611, from 0.154 to 0.358, and from 0.158 to 0.253, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1348 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As leaf area index increased, cumulative drainage slope rose from 0.154 to 0.358.

Outcome
drainage curvese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.154 to 0.358e0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“With increase of LAI, the slopes of cumulative irrigation and drainage curves and the difference between two slopes increased from 0.312 to 0.611, from 0.154 to 0.358, and from 0.158 to 0.253, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1348 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The difference between irrigation and drainage slopes increased from 0.158 to 0.253.

Outcome
difference between two slopese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.158 to 0.253e0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“With increase of LAI, the slopes of cumulative irrigation and drainage curves and the difference between two slopes increased from 0.312 to 0.611, from 0.154 to 0.358, and from 0.158 to 0.253, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1348 · show in text ↑