Abstract
Two groups of olive cultivars were characterized as showing low (Tokhmkabki) and high (Roghani) rooting percentage after application of IBA treatment. Semi-hard wood cuttings were dipped in H 2 2O2 (0-3.5% w/v) and IBA (4000 mg.l-1) and also they were investigated in combination. H2O2 alone did not stimulate rooting of olive cuttings and there were no significant differences between this treatment and control in both cultivars. It was obvious that IBA treatments increased the rooting percentage, number of root cuttings, root length and root fresh\\dry weight in 2 olive cultivars but the combination of IBA and H 2Oin some factors was more effective but there were no significant differences when IBA was used instead of in both cultivars.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
H2O2 alone did not stimulate rooting in either olive cultivar.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeae0 - Treatment
- H2O2e0
- Outcome
- rooting of olive cuttingse0
- Direction
- did not stimulatee0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“H2O2 alone did not stimulate rooting of olive cuttings and there were no significant differences between this treatment and control in both cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
The IBA and H2O2 combination was more effective for some rooting factors, without a significant difference from IBA alone.
- Taxon
- oliveOlea europaeat0
- Treatment
- the combination of IBA and H 2Oe0
- Outcome
- some factorse0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- IBAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the combination of IBA and H 2Oin some factors was more effective but there were no significant differences when IBA was used instead of in both cultivars”
t0“Olive”
The same questions in other papers
hydrogen peroxide · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.