Paper · 2011 · International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Modelling of mass transfer and texture evaluation during osmotic dehydration of melon under vacuum

Cristhiane C. Ferrari; Javier R. Arballo; Rodolfo H. Mascheroni; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summary The influence of vacuum time and solution concentration on mass transfer and mechanical properties of osmodehydrated melon cubes has been studied. Pulsed vacuum osmotic dehydration (PVOD) was carried out at 30 °C for 4 h, using sucrose solutions (40, 50 or 60°Brix) and applying a vacuum pulse (100 mbar for 5, 10 or 15 min). Kinetics of water loss, solid gain and stress at rupture were analysed, as well as effective diffusivities using the hydrodynamic model. The increase in solution concentration favoured water removal, but no significant effect of vacuum time was observed. The use of less concentrated solutions coupled to the action of vacuum pulse resulted in greater solid uptake. Samples subjected to PVOD using 60°Brix sucrose solution presented greater water loss, lower sugar uptake and better maintenance of fresh fruit texture throughout the process. Diffusion coefficients estimated by the hydrodynamic model showed a good fit to the experimental data.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing solution concentration favored water removal from melon.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
increase in solution concentratione0
Outcome
water removale0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in solution concentration favoured water removal, but no significant effect of vacuum time was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum time had no significant observed effect on melon osmotic dehydration.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
vacuum timee0
Outcome
effect of vacuum timee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in solution concentration favoured water removal, but no significant effect of vacuum time was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less concentrated solutions combined with a vacuum pulse increased solid uptake in melon.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
less concentrated solutions coupled to the action of vacuum pulsee0
Outcome
solid uptakee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of less concentrated solutions coupled to the action of vacuum pulse resulted in greater solid uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60°Brix sucrose solution produced greater water loss in melon samples.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PVOD using 60°Brix sucrose solutione0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples subjected to PVOD using 60°Brix sucrose solution presented greater water loss, lower sugar uptake and better maintenance of fresh fruit texture throughout the process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60°Brix sucrose solution produced lower sugar uptake in melon samples.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PVOD using 60°Brix sucrose solutione0
Outcome
sugar uptakee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples subjected to PVOD using 60°Brix sucrose solution presented greater water loss, lower sugar uptake and better maintenance of fresh fruit texture throughout the process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60°Brix sucrose solution better maintained fresh melon fruit texture during dehydration.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PVOD using 60°Brix sucrose solutione0
Outcome
maintenance of fresh fruit texturee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples subjected to PVOD using 60°Brix sucrose solution presented greater water loss, lower sugar uptake and better maintenance of fresh fruit texture throughout the process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrodynamic-model diffusion coefficients fit the experimental melon data well.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
good fite0
Comparator
experimental datae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diffusion coefficients estimated by the hydrodynamic model showed a good fit to the experimental data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑

sucrose · physiology: water · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.