Paper · 2006 · The Professional Animal Scientist

Timing of Grazing Termination in Dual-Purpose Winter Wheat Enterprises

B.G. Fieser; G.W. Horn; J.T. Edwards; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Timing of grazing termination is a key management variable in maximizing income from dual-purpose winter wheat enterprises. The objective of this research was to determine the effect of grazing hard red winter wheat pasture past first hollow stem (FHS) on steer BW gain and subsequent grain yield, and to develop production functions relative to time of grazing termination. Grazing trials were initiated at the emergence of FHS on March 13 and 5 of 2003 and 2005, respectively. Angus steers (greater than 7/8 Angus) grazed 4 clean-tilled, dryland winter wheat pastures in 2003 (n = 52; 405 ± 30 kg) and a single pasture in 2005 (n = 34; 357 ± 42 kg). Forage allowance averaged 199 kg DM/100 kg BW during 2003 and 133 kg DM/100 kg BW during 2005. Beginning in early February, grazing exclosures were set at approximately weekly intervals. Body weight of growing steers increased linearly (P < 0.01; Y = 392.2 + 1.58x) following FHS at the rate of 1.58 kg/d, and BW gain/ha averaged 147 kg over the 2 years. Grain yield responded quadratically (P < 0.01; Y = 2041.8 − 8.28x − 0.51x2) relative to days grazing past FHS. Grain yield decreased 10% by grazing 2 weeks past FHS, and an additional 10% for each of the next two weeks. Although the steers used in this study were heavy, their BW gain was excellent during the post-FHS grazing period, and reductions in grain yield were less than previously reported in the literature. These production functions should aid development of an economic model for evaluating grazing termination decisions in dual-purpose winter wheat enterprises.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Body weight of growing steers increased linearly with days grazing past first hollow stem, at 1.58 kg/d.

Taxon
steerse0
Treatment
following FHSe0
Outcome
Body weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.58 kg/de0

Verbatim

e0

“Body weight of growing steers increased linearly (P < 0.01; Y = 392.2 + 1.58x) following FHS at the rate of 1.58 kg/d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steer body weight gain per hectare averaged 147 kg over the 2 years.

Taxon
steerse0
Outcome
BW gain/hae1
Value
147 kge1

Verbatim

e0

“Body weight of growing steers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“BW gain/ha averaged 147 kg over the 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1005 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield responded quadratically to days of grazing past first hollow stem.

Treatment
days grazing past FHSe2
Outcome
Grain yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hard red winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield responded quadratically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1042 · show in text ↑
e2

“days grazing past FHS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield decreased 10% by grazing 2 weeks past first hollow stem.

Treatment
grazing 2 weeks past FHSe1
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
10%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hard red winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield decreased 10% by grazing 2 weeks past FHS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield decreased by an additional 10% for each of the next two weeks of grazing.

Treatment
each of the next two weekse1
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
an additional 10%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hard red winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–215 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield decreased 10% by grazing 2 weeks past FHS, and an additional 10% for each of the next two weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions in wheat grain yield were less than previously reported in the literature.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
reductions in grain yielde1
Qualifier
less than previously reported in the literaturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“reductions in grain yield were less than previously reported in the literature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1424 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steer body weight gain was excellent during the post-first-hollow-stem grazing period.

Taxon
steerse0
Outcome
BW gaine0
Qualifier
excellente0

Verbatim

e0

“Although the steers used in this study were heavy, their BW gain was excellent during the post-FHS grazing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1340 · show in text ↑

grazing · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

70 papers: 34 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.